An Open Letter to Russell Brand
+
The Russell Brand Exposé, Intervention and Comedy Roast by Dr Bruce Masters
Three Russell Brand exposés have been published within the past four months; this exposé, the exposé in the Times and the exposé on Channel 4 in the UK.
Brand has not sued or threatened Channel 4 or the Times.
Brand has not told Channel 4 or the Times to be silent.
Brand has not tried to force Channel 4 or the Times to retract their articles or video productions, which is why, if a complaint is made about this exposé, just one of three exposés, it will suggest Brand found no fault with the other two exposés and the many claims therein, which is interesting.
If Brand replies to the claims, suggestions and opinions in this exposé in an attempt to ‘tell his side of the story’ or share ‘his truth’ but doesn’t publish a reply to the claims made in the other two exposés, this will suggest Brand agrees with the overall content of the first two exposés.
***
Despite Dr Masters having great faith in his content, be it in written or videographic form, his content must be considered to be his unique and individual opinion only. All content on this site/channel represents Masters’ personal opinions and his sense of humour, and his opinions (and humour) are not those of a particular university, organisation, political party or nation, but his own.
All content included within this open letter and all content included within the three-hour video exposé (other than Dr Masters’ opinions) is already in the public domain and is being reproduced in the interests of establishing the truth, reducing crime and for education purposes. This exposé is all about free speech, openness and transparency.
Mr Brand should of course be considered an innocent man until proven guilty in a court of law. He denies all charges and accusations made against him.
The Russell Brand exposé is over three hours in length spread over thirteen instalments.
The exposé videos are related to and referenced in Bruce Masters’ open letter to Russell Brand, which is recommended reading prior to watching the video exposé series, if possible.
It is advisable to view the Russell Brand exposé (both the open letter and the videos) on a large screen as the open letter is 24,000 words in length and many of the videos include text also.
Future instalments of the exposé and related content will appear on brucemasters.org.
Subscribe to email updates or follow Bruce on Twitter/X for the latest updates and developments.
The First Six Videos (Ninety Minutes) of the Russell Brand Exposé
Below are direct download links to the separate video productions as well as links to video-sharing sites where they are currently hosted.
The second video in the series has two versions; the first version is available for direct download below whereas version two, an edited/redacted video for social media reproduction, is the one featured in the Dailymotion link—I strongly recommend downloading and viewing version one, if you have spare storage space.
If the links below do not work, please get in touch and new links and means to view the exposé will be added immediately. Thank you.
Video 1: Russell Brand: Origins, Paedophilia, Savile, COVID and Groping
Direct download links:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/riytlxq77bl3hsg/brand-expose-video1.mp4/file
https://mega.nz/file/YCllSLIS#fn_OfT0yC2t9sot3DNI2GAjC_QS1JlOSTC-1mGOIIqs
Video 2: Russell Brand: Life Imitating Art Imitating Life Imitating Art…
Version One
Direct download links
https://mega.nz/file/4TVlAJ7K#iZpKFid-ggEFQNkfsAFIePN8kvJcdpD6MwT-5N0cabA
Version Two
Video 3: Russell Brand vs. Laura Brand: A Reckoning
Direct download links
https://www.mediafire.com/file/2qnv6km757a1wp2/brand-expose-video3.mp4/file
https://mega.nz/file/MHlXnQQR#jHl-1onFxxC9jAUYOFz_OMa1Zq9EcDyBiXQg60NS-s8
Video 4: Russell Brand: Narcissism, Lies, Homophobia, Marxism and Zero Empathy
Direct download links
https://www.mediafire.com/file/8t8veldbq99gqvy/brand-expose-video4.mp4/file
https://mega.nz/file/cbdFmaII#EJe8bGfwPJL_9FeWS5ICtcIF-MKrP_LZEJjrYdGB9jM
Video 5: Russell Brand, This Is Your Life: An Overview of Brand’s Eleven Years on YouTube
Direct download links
https://www.mediafire.com/file/1tng8r50rcrla2z/Brand+No.+5+(15+minutes).mp4/file
https://mega.nz/file/1D8X2BBS#s-lsYaT1tNfPkl5cN0GpLQxoFfD9i0GBo6dqX6WmOBA
Video 6: Russell Brand the Golden Child + more lies, more paedophiles and worrying admissions
Direct download links
https://www.mediafire.com/file/v516dyzi9a6l2eo/video6.mp4/file
https://mega.nz/file/dXFlDZbT#p9sByKWfA2-6mdSyVblWU2kiTkRdmsFZZwszdZeAjBQ
The Open Letter
Sex Tourism
I – and I imagine a great many people – would like to know the purpose of your holidays with your photographer father in the past, which, to me, seem to be little more than misogynist sex tourism excursions.
I would not mention this, I would not repeat what you have already covered within your autobiography, were it not for the 2002 documentary you made with your father where you mentioned ‘having that lovely young Filipino one’—as in you paid for the services of a young Filipino prostitute during your holiday with your father.
You claimed in your autobiography that the whole time you were on holiday you had sex every day with a myriad of prostitutes without ever wearing protection. What troubles me greatly is that I am uncertain as to whether your sex tourism holiday was a ‘standard sex tourism vacation’ or whether it was something far darker. There are several reasons why I suggest this as a possibility:
1/ Your staunch, passionate and hard to understand defence of the convicted and unapologetic paedophile Rolf Harris following his conviction and imprisonment. (Covered within the exposé)
2/ Your previous attacks against the mainstream media/legacy media in their efforts to expose paedophiles. (Covered within the exposé)
3/ Due to previously, in my opinion, downplaying the dangers that paedophiles pose to children, comparing them once to ‘Dracula, Pinocchio and negative fairies’, and going on to call paedophiles ‘the contemporary monster’. (Covered within the exposé)
4/ You stating that the ‘madam’ of the brothel (where you procured the ‘young Filipino girl’) insisted on joining the two prostitutes you and your father paid to come to your hotel, it seeming as though she was a guardian or chaperone of the young Filipino prostitute. Why would a madam need to escort adult professional prostitutes to the hotel of a client? This is surely unheard of.
5/ You were only sixteen at the time of the incident. When a sixteen-year-old has sex with a nineteen-year-old, he refers to her as being old, or at least older than him. So if you were sixteen, it stands to reason that the age of the ‘young Filipino one’ (as you described her when you were twenty-seven, recounting the sordid episode with a smile on your face and a twinkle in your eye) was not nineteen, or seventeen, or the same age as you, sixteen; so how old was she? And is this where your morality in regards to the age of consent and morality in regards to sexual relations with children was born? You asked your followers if it was justice to jail Rolf Harris; you asked what joy anyone could get from imprisoning that very dangerous predatory, cunning, deceptive, controlling and manipulative paedophile.
6/ You once told a psychologist that you were breastfed until the age of thirteen.
7/ You have admitted that you had a sexual relationship with a sixteen-year-old schoolgirl in the UK when you were an adult, almost twice her age.
Your father (Ron) and you were having sex at the same time in the same hotel room, both inebriated on copious amounts of champagne according to you. The two of you had procured two prostitutes, one of whom you said was young; you make no mention of the age of the second.
You have spoken about this event in your autobiography. You also spoke about it in 2002 (when you were twenty-seven years of age) and were smiling, happy and jubilant as you looked back fondly (see the exposé videos) to the time when you said you ‘fell in love’ with the young prostitute you lost your virginity to as Ron and the other prostitute (joined by the overseeing madam) were lying in the bed right next to you.
You said to your father back in 2002 (evidenced in the exposé) that you believed the madam liked him, that she even fancied him, and that is why she came back to your shared hotel room ‘for free’, why she didn’t charge to join the two prostitutes. Let’s apply Occam’s razor here—the explanation that requires the fewest assumptions is usually correct. The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
Would this madam have any respect for or attraction to a sex tourist? Think about it. The madam would have immense disdain for a Western elitist misogynist sex tourist who travels thousands of miles to use young Asian girls in the sun in an exercise of hedonistic abandon and excess that verges on dehumanisation and racism, or at least racial supremacy and/or entitlement. Further, prostitution is not a pleasant profession; you would not offer your services for free, ever.
You call this woman the ‘madam’, but was she in fact something else? Was she the jailor of those girls? Did those young prostitutes want to be with you and your father in the hotel? Were those young girls being kept against their will? Were they under duress? Or was the madam present to keep them in line or for ‘training purposes’—which suggests they must be very young and naïve and there against their will.
***
If you hadn’t mentioned the fact that the first prostitute you had sex with on that holiday was young.
If you hadn’t offered bizarre and passionate defences for the paedophile Rolf Harris.
If you hadn’t attacked the media for exposing paedophiles.
If you hadn’t touched and kissed so many children over the years.
If you hadn’t once had a sexual relationship with a sixteen-year-old schoolgirl when you were a grown man.
If you hadn’t (according to Simon Hattenstone of the Guardian) flirted with eight-year-old children at a drop-in for asylum seekers in London.
And if you hadn’t tickled so many children over so many years I wouldn’t think the worst of you and your father in this hour; yet everything I just said is all evidenced in my exposé and a very ugly picture of entitlement, abuse, extreme misogyny, perversion and potential criminality is created, especially as you and your father were visiting seedy joints where the prostitutes were all dressed in bikinis….
You have spoken about regretting tickling children in recent years. Do you also regret choosing to have sex with those young prostitutes? And how young were they?
Those who come to your defence may say that the dozens of photos available online of you touching, holding and kissing or tickling other people’s children (non-relations) is merely proof positive that you ‘love children’; yet when you refuse to engage in nappy changes and outsource all child-rearing duties to long-suffering Laura (by your own admission), I am left wondering how you can love children if you refuse to render care to your own children, if you refuse to get your hands dirty in order to help them.
I will reproduce a few collages of images at the end of this section where you have been observed making contact with other people’s children and kissing children in the interests of causing you to immediately refrain from ever repeating these actions again. You are not a politician seeking election; you are not Jesus; you are a very blue comedian who is a self-admitted sex addict and one-time (apparent) sex-tourist who didn’t want Rolf Harris to be jailed—you should have ZERO contact with children for the remainder of your life. Actions must have consequences; you are not above the law.
It matters not how your absurd world outlook or morality came about. What matters is you have no business being around children. You have no business opining on issues such as sexual abuse and paedophilia. You are dangerous due to being impulsive, due to your over-inflated ego, due to your toxic narcissism and due to wrongly believing you are a modern messiah, divine and a blessing to all people, including children.
Do you remember a few years back when you told an interviewer (covered in the exposé) that ‘people are paedophiles’? What are you Russell? That’s right, a person.
What troubles me is that you are inviting children of various ages to meet with you at your community festival in July and they need to pay for the privilege also.
This is a screenshot from your website taken today, the 8th of January 2024, stating that you are inviting teenagers, pubescent children and pre-pubescent children to visit Russell Brand for the weekend. Interestingly, you call thirteen to seventeen-year-olds children, despite admitting to having a relationship with a sixteen-year-old in the past, which is an admission that you consider that a relationship with a child.
This is the advertisement for the event on russellbrand.com:
‘Friday 19th – Monday 22nd July
‘Community is about personal awakening and social change.
‘Russell Brand and friends will be back for 3 days of camping, conversation on spirituality, wellness, healthy living and our environment.
‘Limber up for yoga or Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, enjoy musical performances, relax with meditation and massage from a range of holistic healers on site.’
To sum up: Young children are being invited by Russell to attend. Massages are offered and Mr Russell Brand, who is very touchy-feely with both children and adults and who regularly kisses and hugs children of all ages, will be there the entire time.
Here are a few scenes from the 2022 get together, which show that young children do indeed attend this event, as do folk such as Wim Hof, a friend of Russell’s, who is mentioned in the exposé several times due to Laura Brand having complained publicly about not wanting to join Russell in doing the Wim Hof cult-like (and many have claimed dangerous and totally unnecessary) group breathing practices that she says caused her to scream at Russell, ‘I don’t want to do this, I hate this.’ (See exposé video no 3.)
The comments below the video in question are what I would expect from such a gathering of irresponsible hedonists and privileged existentialist narcissists. It is likely that a majority of the “free love” and “hippy” types Brand’s festival attracts will be high on drugs the entire time. Videos of previous years seem to attest to that fact; very few of the adults seem sober in the footage I have reviewed.
Rolf Harris Newly Cast as a Villain
In the exposé it is revealed that Brand has a lot of opinions about the jailing of Rolf Harris, and whilst speaking about the disgraced unapologetic paedophile who hoodwinked everybody, he claimed Rolf Harris was being ‘newly cast as a villain’.
How did he come to be arrested and convicted in court, Russell?
What had he done?
Are you stating a miscarriage of justice has been committed? That he shouldn’t have been jailed?
What did he do, Russell?
That’s right, commit crimes. He cast himself as a villain; get it right. There was no agenda at play; he broke the law, multiples laws.
Motivations for Me Creating the Russell Brand Exposé and Associated Biographical Book
I had just completed a long-term writing project (a dozen books I had wished to write) within a two-year period after successfully detangling myself from social media and external influences and thought bubbles and all the rest of it (First World problems, I know) and was just days from publishing the first wave of my new books when the allegations concerning Russell Brand were made public.
I do not know Brand, I only vaguely know of him.
I do not know those who have made the allegations and I am not a journalist, but I am British and I do have a great love for my nation and people and justice, which is why I felt compelled to intercede due to having skills and abilities that often prove invaluable to the cause of establishing the truth.
After my long writing adventure and break from social media, I gave myself a two-week holiday, where I planned to do nothing, to think about nothing, to write nothing, to learn nothing and to investigate nothing … and then ‘BrandGate’ happened.…
I saw many disturbing things in Brand’s denial/rebuttal videos, and due to being a psychologist and an expert in the areas of reading non-verbal communication, spotting lies and gaslighting and also being the foremost authority on ConjectureMania and conspiracy theorism (and understanding the link between narcissism and the priests of ConjectureMania (theorists)), I could not, unfortunately, remain silent and do nothing as Mr Brand continued claiming to be the victim whilst proliferating the theory that he was being persecuted and selectively targeted (I had really wanted that two-week break).
It should be known that I did not watch the Dispatches program on Channel 4; nor did I read the pieces in the Times. The only content I was exposed to was Brand’s, and my gut told me that something was amiss.
If Brand was telling the truth, if his rebuttal/defence videos had convinced me that entire nations and cabals and conspiracies were all conspiring together to eliminate this comedian-tuned-liberator, if I believed for a single second that what he was saying was the honest truth and nothing but the truth, I would have instantly joined with Brand and become his comrade—as what he alludes to in his aggressive defence to these serious and potentially imprisonable offences is an innocent man, a father, a husband who has pets and does yoga is being selectively attacked and persecuted by the media, the UK state, likely the US state, “big pharma”, Soros and all the other “bad guys” and scapegoats. What else can he be suggesting when he mentions words such as ‘agenda’ and ‘they’/‘them’.
If I thought this was true, I would be Brand’s biggest supporter; yet, due to being the author of the book The Truth at Last, 33 Essential Questions for Conspiracy Theorists (which disproves all conspiracy theories, explains what creates conspiracy theorism, ends conspiracy theorism and frees conspiracy theists from the narcissistic control of conspiracy theorists) I was able to separate fact from fiction, emotion and claimed persecution from reality.
If there was indeed an “agenda” to take out Brand, would he still be broadcasting his voice to millions? Wouldn’t he have died of a “suicidal” heroin overdose by now? Of course he would, of course he would; ergo, the “Illuminati” or “aliens” or “big pharma” do not consider him to be a threat in any way whatsoever, he just desires conspiracy theists (believers of, rather than creators of, improvable theories) to believe that this is the case.
Why should anyone fear the “NWO” or the “Illuminati” when their most deadly tactics consist of a short documentary on Channel Four and an article in a newspaper? Preposterous.
In regards to Soros, I will say at this point that I am no fan of his for multiple reasons, including him near bankrupting the Bank of England (and being unapologetic about that fact) not so long ago, due to his world outlook/politics, and also for smiling at a rather inappropriate time in the past when discussing a subject that shouldn’t make anyone smile.
I am far from a Soros fanboy; nor am I on his payroll (clearly); nor am I a dreaded “shill” for anyone; nor am I a globalist, which is why the vulnerable many who believe every word Brand says, those hoodwinked by him and Icke and Jones, etc., will be more likely to respond to my outreach and intervention due to so many (rightly) mistrusting states and politicians, the police and media due to historic failings and inequality. There exists a profound socioeconomic aspect to conspiracy theism. Only the theorists at the top of the ConjectureMania pyramid are rich (the priests/theorists/leaders); all others are underprivileged, undereducated and economically poor—easy prey for the cunning and controlling egocentric opportunist supremacist narcissist.
I am not the state, I am not the MSM or “legacy media”, I am not a globalist; I am none of these things. I am just me, a man who spent his first holiday in years creating an exposé about Russell Brand, which will be completely deleted and removed by myself if Mr Brand agrees to my very amicable and fair terms—if he deletes all his social media accounts and removes himself for all time from public life and devotes himself solely to his family and only his family.
I sincerely hope he chooses this path (which I will discuss in more detail later in this letter) as the alternative path will see his followers leaving him by the millions, and above all else, Brand hates rejection and being told, ‘No.’
Mr Brand once said that he believed allegations of a sexual assault in the case of Leon Brittan (a UK politician) prior to a criminal trial taking place, why? Why did Brand believe the allegations?—Because there were four accusers:
‘Well, I think it is for me to judge, I think the claims are true, if you get four people making these allegations; two of them a little bit “jittery” because they’ve had lives of abuse….’
—Russell Brand, youtube.com/@RussellBrand, The Trews (E244) Jan 28, 2015
At the time when Brand stated he believed the accusations were true (only seven days after Brittan died), Brand identified as left wing and a socialist and anti-establishment, which is likely his motivation for automatically believing the guilt of Brittan as he was a Conservative—tribalistic/partisan point scoring.
I noted the same thing when I began my ‘SchofieldGate’ investigation some years back, with Phillip Schofield mirroring Brand’s behaviour almost exactly—exposing bad behaviour and paedophilia on the right (confronting David Cameron with a list of Conservative suspected sex offenders) whilst seemingly ignoring identical criminal and unethical behaviour, on the left—as paedophilia and sexual abuse are not limited to the left or right, they are present wherever unempathic, self-centred narcissists are present, which all too often is within politics, on the left and the right.
You can view my efforts in regards to exposing Schofield on brucemasters.org, which led to Phillip eventually being removed from the airwaves/TV screens.
Unlike Brand and Schofield, I do not selectively target folk due to their politics, as politics should have nothing to do with justice. I am a believer in equality, which is why I have criticised Boris Johnson as well as Jeremy Corbyn, for instance. No individual should be allowed to commit crimes, abuse their position of power and trust simply due to us being politically aligned with them—truth, justice and honesty are more important than anything else.
Brand showed great anger towards a Conservative politician establishment figure over unproven claims; yet, only six months earlier, my brief independent investigation has discovered that on Jun 30, 2014 (‘Rolf Harris: What Should We Think?’ Russell Brand The Trews (E90)) he launched an amazingly impassioned defence of the disgraced convicted and proven and unapologetic paedophile Rolf Harris.
Was the clear double standard due to Rolf being a fellow eccentric entertainer, his childhood idol, because he was a fellow narcissist, or because he was similarly liberally minded? Whatever the motivation, Brand judged and condemned one man (Brittan) whilst claiming that imprisoning a convicted and proven bad guy and danger to all children (Rolf) did not bring him ‘joy’ and asked his millions of stalwart followers if they believed that jailing the disgraced entertainer ‘was justice’.
In the case of Mr Brand there are more than four accusers in regards to his behaviour, far more than four, and potentially more allegations will come to light in the coming weeks as a result of my brief investigation and exposé, none of which would have been possible were it not for Brand’s YouTube channels due to me heavily relying on his own videos, going back two decades, in order to create the video productions in question and as a foundation for the book in question also—which will surely, if I am true to form (I reference my ‘Rowling trilogy’ exposé here), multiply into two books should the entertainer respond as Rowling did some years back when I sought to publish an uncomplimentary biography about her, with legal threats and aggression rather than with contrition, humility and wisdom. More on the companion book later.
The first four videos I am publishing today (the first hour of a three-hour audio/visual exposé) are but the tip of the iceberg and mostly comedic—I had just written a dozen serious books after all. The remaining nine videos will be less comedic and more serious.
Mr Brand has only two choices:
Be cancelled
Or
Cancel himself
I am sure the Times and Channel Four ‘pulled their punches’; I know there was much they did not include, but I am not them.
***
The end results of this expansive and detailed exposé will explain instantly my motivations for spending these past weeks creating the productions in question:
The end results of this exposé video series include but are not limited to:
- A massive decrease in the number of vocal paedophile apologists and those who downplay the dangers and seriousness of rape and paedophilia and who feel emboldened enough to share their dangerous opinions online.
- Many will become educated in regards to narcissism, narcissistic control and narcissistic compassion, scapegoating, disgust, masking, extreme neoliberalism, self-abnegation and much else appertaining to psychology and psychiatry. Among the comedy and the shocking moments are aspects of useful education.
- All members of the Brand family will see their happiness increase, especially Laura and her children.
- It will serve to be a cautionary tale in regards to the dangers of refusing to grow up, of refusing to be responsible, refusing to be accountable and refusing to ever be honest, authentic and your natural self.
- It will increase justice by inspiring others far and wide to demand or create justice themselves via citizen journalism, via individual actions, via protests, via organising, via loud and even comedic and satirical complaints.
- It will prove to all that there is no Illuminati-NWO-Alien-big pharma-MSM-super cabal organisation that is trying to “take out” Mr Brand or conspiracy theorists in general because by every metric I am the opposite of “NWO”, the opposite of mainstream, yet I have infused a huge amount of energy, time and will into the pursuit of examining, psychoanalysing and critiquing Russell Brand.
If my investigation had found nothing, how could I have produced a single fifteen-minute video, let alone thirteen separate fifteen-minute videos as well as a 100,000-word+ companion book?
The result of both mainstream and non-mainstream voices calling out Brand’s societally/culturally bad, toxic and long-time narcissistic behaviour and self-entitlement will have the end result of reducing the number of those who are codependent upon cult-like celebrity online ‘conspiracy theory influencers’, aka the priests of ConjectureMania; see my book The Truth at Last: 33 Essential Questions for Conspiracy Theorists for more information.
If Brand was under attack from “them”, why is he still at liberty? Why is he still spreading his doom-mongering for profit? Because there is no “them” outside of the imagination, but there is justice and there is karma.
Why Thirteen Videos?
The video exposé series is three hours in length (spread over thirteen instalments) due to there being so much content to work with thanks to Brand’s YouTube channels and his life being spent in front of cameras of various sorts. I could have extended this video series to twenty videos or thirty, yet I believe thirteen is enough.
Each video has a separate theme or feel, with specific points being made. As a result, each video has been given a helpful title that describes the content:
(This video series was originally uploaded to YouTube (https://youtube.com/@bruce_masters) to be published there; yet YouTube has banned this exposé from being aired on their platform and chosen to terminate my YouTube account. I have written an article on the subject.)
Why YouTube terminated Bruce Masters’ account today
In one way, this is useful as it proves to Brand and those who are ‘on his side’ that those who criticise Brand or warn about the dangers of conspiracy theorism are not all on the same page or in the same international “Illuminati” club.
YouTube deleted the video trailer for my book The Truth at Last! 33 Essential Questions for Conspiracy Theorists, which disproves all major conspiracy theories. Despite YouTube’s actions being annoying, they do illustrate that my books and exposés are not condoned by YouTube/Google, etc.
YouTube’s brutal censorship is evidence that I am independent and a truth-seeker, rather than a shill or someone’s employee or lackey.
The terminated YouTube channel was a new channel, with the only content uploaded being video trailers for books (including my peace book, How We Will Create Peace in Ukraine and the World) and the first few videos of the Russell Brand exposé.
It is unlikely that YouTube sought to censor the peace book, which leads me to conclude it was Brand’s content being reproduced (for purposes of critique and education) that caused my channel to be terminated without a warning or a strike or any explanation as to why it was terminated.
The Russell Brand video exposé series:
Video 1: (Monday 15th January)
Russell Brand: Origins, Paedophilia, Savile, COVID and Groping
Video 2: (Monday 15th January)
Russell Brand: Life Imitating Art Imitating Life Imitating Art…
Video 3: (Monday 15th January)
Russell Brand vs. Laura Brand: A Reckoning
Video 4: (Monday 15th January)
Russell Brand: Narcissism, Lies, Homophobia, Marxism and Zero Empathy
Video 5: (Monday 22nd January)
Russell Brand, This Is Your Life: An Overview of Brand’s Eleven Years on YouTube
Video 6: (Monday 22nd January)
Russell Brand the Golden Child + more lies, more paedophiles and worrying admissions
Video 7: (Coming Soon)
Russell Brand vs. Hollywood featuring LOTR, Omen, Exorcist + Saddam Hussein
Video 8: (Coming Soon)
Russell Brand’s Career-Long Paedophile and Paedophilia Obsessions
Video 9: (Coming Soon)
Russell Brand: Groping, Abuse of Power, Disgust and the ‘Casting Couch’
Video 10: (Coming Soon)
Russell Brand: Nationalism, Patriotism, Classism and Anti-White Racism
Video 11: (Coming Soon)
Russell Brand: Body Language, Eyes, Hypocrisy and Grooming
Video 12: (Coming Soon)
The Russell Brand Exposé: The Very Worst of Russell Brand
Video 13: (Coming Soon)
Russell Brand: Cruelty, Sadism, Emotional Abuse, Bullying and Criminality
Britishness Played a Role in This Exposé
If I were Iranian or Albanian or Greek or Martian I would not have spent two hundred hours or so of my finite time creating this huge exposé, but I was born in Britain, I was raised in Britain and am British through and through, which compelled me into action as most of the harm Brand has caused throughout his life has occurred in Britain. Most of the allegations are coming out of (but are not limited to) Britain and he continues to spread doom and cognitive dissonance and mistrust in systems and states from Britain—I consider my actions to be civically minded.
I see myself as akin to a neighbour of Brand who has chronicled all his various wrongdoings over the years and is now highlighting them for the rest of the village to watch, in the interests of educating the other villagers as well as educating Brand. If my intervention does not reach him and change him, nothing will, and he will truly be a lost cause.
Regarding the Exposé Videos
Each video will be fifteen minutes in length and all will be different in style and content.
If any attempt is made to censor these videos (beyond the censorship already experienced from YouTube) or to remove them from where they are hosted by anti-free-speech folk masquerading as pro-free-speech folk, the videos will assuredly, legally, be reuploaded elsewhere. No copyright is claimed nor infringement intended, nor is any of the exposé content libellous, bur rather is a combination of facts and opinion – all content included within the productions is reproduced on fair usage grounds, with it being necessary to share content featuring Brand, even created by him, for reasons of critique and education.
The videos will likely cause Mr Brand to voluntarily leave the internet which will allow the vulnerable many under his control and influence to once again be free and independent, rather than continuing to be wholly dependent upon him, wholly (psychologically) reliant on him, as they hang on his every paranoia-and-suspicion-infused word. This has to stop, this has to stop immediately.
If Mr Brand chooses to double down once more; if he tells folk, ‘Bruce Masters is “in bed with the “NWO” and thus should be ignored,’ the videos (especially the upcoming videos) will be useful in establishing the true nature of his character over a long period of time, enhanced by the fact that in the companion book I reference many of the clips and documents and facts shared within the video productions in question.
The videos will be educational whilst also having a clear evidentiary value, with videos such as video no. 5, for instance, serving to show Brand’s descent into the world of conspiracy theorism and his increasing lurch towards doom spreading and fear mongering for profit and stardom and notoriety.
Video no. 5 is important as if Brand does not delete all of his content concurrently and chooses to selectively remove a few videos or a few dozen videos that prove hypocrisy (as in the case of the Brittan video) or suggest he has paedophilic and terroristic sympathies (things I have observed in dozens of his videos) all will know just what it is that he has deleted and self-censored.
That fifth video is essential viewing both now and after a period of weeks once Brand has had chance to digest this letter, digest the current videos and also the upcoming videos, as there exist huge swathes of content, hours’ worth of content, that is truly condemning. Most will agree he will seek to remove selective content, which will be an admission of wrongdoing/damage limitation. Whereas the deletion of everything concurrently (as I request later in this letter) will convey contrition and empathy and growth, rather than obstruction and belligerency, which is what selective deletions would amount to.
Prejudicing Trials and Contempt of Court
Why this video exposé series and the accompanying book cannot prejudice any future potential trials:
The vast majority of video content involving Mr Brand that has been used was uploaded to his channels by himself and at time of writing is still available for one and all to view. He wants everyone, including men, women and children from every nation on Earth, to watch these videos. None of this information is privileged or private or sensitive; it all exists in the public domain.
Brand’s lawyer/KC:
‘Jurors may have watched some of the Bruce Masters videos. As a result Mr Brand must be declared to be innocent, he is immune from prosecution … because that content makes my client look bad.’
Judge:
‘But Mr Brand uploaded those videos to the internet himself and encouraged over eight billion human beings to watch and absorb that information. All Masters did was reproduce Brand’s content. Masters did not force Mr Brand to say those words or to do those things; Masters did not force Mr Brand to cause Laura Brand to scream after being pressured and pestered to engage in (what she took to be) dangerous advanced and experimental breathing practices. This was Brand’s choice, just as it was Brand’s choice in June 2022 (youtube.com/@AwakeningWithRussell ‘Want To Feel Better? Try This!’) to share the video in which his wife Laura publicly complained about what many observers will conclude equates to emotional abuse/bullying.
‘Mr Brand has kept nothing secret, he has shared his life via the medium of his autobiographies and his video diaries, aka his uploads to sites such as YouTube. The fact that Brand could have edited out his wife’s public complaints/scolding of him/cry for help when he had the ability and power to edit that content out is most worrying of all as it suggests he either feels untouchable or did not understand that Laura, his wife, was genuinely upset, traumatised and desperate for her husband to treat her with respect.’
If I had not decided to create this exposé series of videos as a result of Brand’s rebuttal and defence videos and Laura had decided she wanted a divorce, would Brand and his legal team have complained if Laura wished to admit into evidence the video in which she very publicly and very vocally confronts Mr Brand (which makes him appear uncomfortable) in regards to him forcing her/pressuring her into engaging in experimental and (for her) traumatising breathing practices?
This is evidence, and it seems that Mr Brand agrees with his wife’s assessment and claims as he does not disagree in the video; he replies with silence instead, after nervously checking on the reaction of the audience. His eyes creep slowly from left to right before his head turns after silently mouthing words to her after she publicly shamed him and exposed Brand’s alleged (by his wife) obsessive and controlling behaviour.
If Mr Brand was arguing that the divorce should not take place, if he was refusing to divorce his wife and refusing to separate from her, this single video (in my opinion) would be enough to grant her a near immediate divorce in the majority of civilised and democratic nations in the world, who would disagree? This is surely unreasonable behaviour, verging on torture and psychological abuse if maintained over a long period of time if Brand remains unwavering in his desire for Laura to engage in acts that scare and traumatise her. Does she deserve this treatment? No.
Further, in regards to awarding custody of the children following a potential divorce and separation, surely every single one of Mr Brand’s two and a half thousand videos uploaded to YouTube would all become essential evidence, absolutely essential, in terms of establishing his character and his suitability to become the sole caregiver?
Re: Contempt of court, common law, the ongoing investigations and innocence:
None of the content published within the exposé video series, or in the companion book, interferes with any current investigations by the Metropolitan Police or other police forces. I am not in contact with any of the accusers; I have no need to reference the individual cases and no desire to as I am neither a journalist nor a prosecutor. The exposé videos and book concern everything but the current allegations and only exist due to Mr Brand’s rebuttal/defence videos. If he had remained silent (his right) until after the investigations by the relevant authorities, you would not be reading these words.
Mr Russell Brand should be considered innocent until proven guilty in regards to the current police investigations in the United Kingdom and elsewhere.
The biographical exposé does not make the case that he is guilty of rape or sexual assault or innocent of these things; rather, it is biographical, with a focus on psychoanalysis and his childhood and issues with mental health and substance abuse as well as also focusing upon the culture and climate of institutional misogyny at the BBC and a detailed and forensic explanation as to how it was possible that Mr Brand was able to, for instance, grope Lorraine (national treasure) Kelly’s leg with absolute impunity on at least two separate occasions whilst concurrently cursing at her, which is covered within one of the video exposés in question.
There are also aspects of the book that concern changes to the criminal justice system in relation to the reporting of sexual offences and historic offences in order to restore confidence in the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) and the police and the establishment as a whole.
I add my small and independent voice to that of the Times, which has called for the recent statement published by the attorney general of the UK to be retracted as it seems to have no basis in law.
In my view (read my book How Not to Get Sued by J.K. Rowling, I have a fair grasp of the law) it is in the public interest for UK-based publications such as the Times, who made the police investigation possible due to their diligence and impeccable journalism, to be able to opine on this case as it progresses—because Mr Russell Brand is able to mount ongoing defences in the court of public opinion, having a massive reach, a national and international reach. Currently there exists an imbalance, which is another reason why I am inserting myself into BrandGate temporarily—to create balance.
If a UK citizen present within the UK was addressing crowds numbering in the millions on a daily basis in parks or similar public spaces whilst under investigation for serious (sex) crimes who had previously called for revolutions and who repeatedly said they were willing to ‘die for the cause’, would all be sitting on their hands in this hour in the Lords and the Commons and Downing Street and be happy to tolerate that ongoing situation and state of affairs? No.
The internet is no different, and millions of people firmly believe him (Brand), which is dangerous to the establishment and to the state and to public order.
I remind that it was my recommendations and staunch campaigning for an extended period of time that eventually led to many sensible and necessary changes to the UK response in regards to COVID; this not only proves that my voice bears listening to but also this disproves the theories in regards to the pandemic.
I have evidenced to only a small degree in the first exposé video that it was myself, rather than the government, who from the very beginning sought to lock down the UK.
I sought to negate the need for masks and social distancing, yet once the Pandemic was upon us these are the measures I advised continually to political representatives in addition to being a vocal advocate for the grounding of all flights, which, again, came into effect after my campaigns and efforts.
If Mr Brand were remanded in prison, meaning he could not commit any criminal offences and could not influence the general public (potential jurors) into believing him and his story and version of events in advance (potentially prejudicing the trial), gagging the UK press would be easier to understand and accept. Yet he is able to move freely, he may pose a continuing risk, and he is able to regularly opine on the case to his more than 11 million worldwide followers.
Mr Brand has suggested that he might be the victim of a conspiracy and has been “silenced”. This has been disproven as Mr Brand himself refused to provide a comment to media outlets such as the BBC in recent days, despite having every opportunity to do so. Mr Brand has silenced himself…
It should also be noted that Mr Brand is financially capitalising from the police investigations into him and his previous conduct by requesting his followers (6.65 million on YouTube alone) all pay the sum of $60 in order to receive updates in a closed forum, evidence of which is provided in the video exposés in question.
If ten million of Mr Brand’s followers all donated this $60 to him, due to believing him when he suggests he is the victim of an “agenda”, the end result would be that, due to him being investigated for serious crimes, he would suddenly be able to increase his net worth by $600,000,000—six hundred million dollars.
It is in the public interest to prevent a man accused of multiple serious offences over a prolonged period of time from profiting from his sudden notoriety to the tune of six hundred million dollars, potentially—based upon the ten million followers figure.
Mr Brand has, I assert within the book in question, ‘groomed’ his listeners/viewers. I also evidence this within upcoming video productions. I have cited evidence attained via psychoanalysis, behavioural analysis and an analysis of Mr Brand’s non-verbal communication. I have employed my vast knowledge in the areas of psychology, sociology and cult-programming and narcissism.
This is important when we consider the tragic events that occurred on Capitol Hill not all that long ago in the United States.
Brand has often spoken of wishing to create a revolution in the UK.
Mr Brand has millions of followers who believe his every word, judging by the comments under every single video he has produced.
The video content I will be publishing will not reference any active investigations or allegations, rather it exists to:
A/ Educate his followers as to who the ‘real’ Mr Brand is, in the hopes of them seeing through his gaslighting, psychological manipulation tactics, his masks/acting and Brand’s narcissistic control and
B/ (More so in the coming nine additional companion videos) educate and illuminate all in regards to how to spot lies, how to understand non-verbal communication, how the eyes truly are the windows to the soul and an introduction to the ‘masks’ that Mr Brand has worn at different stages of his life, with identifiable patterns of behaviour I have observed as I have examined him from cradle until the present moment. For instance, here is a preview of an upcoming video (none of this information is contested; all is in the public domain):
Mr Brand, during puberty, as well as again in his thirties, admitting to ‘pretending to be a homosexual’ in order to ‘get girls’. I have evidence of this.
Mr Brand, during his youth and adulthood, on multiple separate occasions (none of which are denied by him; again, this information is in the public domain) exposing himself to others. I have evidence of this.
Mr Brand over a prolonged period of time using the same means to cause deep emotional distress to others, the means being to inform men that he had sexual relations with their daughters or granddaughters. I reference the Sachs case, the Sharon Osborne case, the Rod Stewart case and the Geldof case also. I have evidence of this.
These are patterns of behaviour, patterns of antisocial, unethical and potentially criminal behaviour, that have been compiled into book form with references and suggestions for further reading being provided also, as well as a diagnosis being provided. I do not share my opinions in regards to his innocence or guilt, yet I do endeavour to explain who and what Mr Brand is and the true motivations for all of his actions over the years.
Again, I add my voice to the others who are calling for more press freedom in the UK (I am not a member of the press, it should be known) at a time when Mr Brand is able to continue projecting power and defiance every day as his accusers are continually aware that he is potentially making more money now than ever before in his life as a result of them believing in and trusting in the Metropolitan Police and the Crown Prosecution Service.
Mr Brand’s recent staunch denials and his newfound wealth will only cause, in my opinion, to demotivate those with genuine grievances from joining the growing number of those who have made serious allegations in relation to Mr Brand.
I am aware there are also historic allegations and police investigations in regards to impropriety and complaints of a sexual nature against Mr Brand, such as the masseuse whose complaint to the police, although resulting in an investigation, ultimately led nowhere; is it not prudent to review this and other previous serious allegations in this hour?
All victims deserve justice, yet those who are told that there is not enough evidence will be loath to come forward now, fearing a repeat of what occurred previously during a time period when Mr Brand was a household name and an ‘establishment figure’, evidenced by Mr Brand’s input being infused into government committees as well as due to his one-time relationship with Ed Miliband and Noel Gallagher and Caroline Lucas and due to being interviewed on Newsnight as well as many other mainstream shows and programmes.
If Mr Brand had remained silent until his trial or acquittal or conviction, or until the CPS decided there was not enough evidence to proceed, I would not have written or published the biographical exposé in question, nor would I now be busy creating the final few videos in the video exposé series—these things are rebuttals to his rebuttals….
I am providing balance and perspective, especially as UK-based media outlets fear sanctions at the present time, which compels me to ‘come into bat for them’ for a limited time as there exists common purpose: protect victims, empower victims, reassure victims.
A Fair Trade and Escaping the ‘Lose-Lose’ Situation
Russell, remove yourself from social media and I will delete the four already published exposé videos (one hour in length), refrain from publishing the other nine videos (an additional two hours) and will never publish the book.
I am not the BBC, Channel Four or the “deep state”. You have nothing to fear; I’m just a truth seeker doing my civic duty.
Russell, please know that currently you are in a ‘lose-lose’ situation.
If you are acquitted, your followers will know there is no conspiracy or “agenda” at play and thus will unfollow you (a victory for you is not a victory for you).
If you are convicted, the majority of your followers (who will all watch my revealing videos, all thirteen of them) will choose to unfollow you due to their renewed belief in the system and government, resulting from the gag order (on the press) if nothing else disproving your claims of a conspiracy and due also to them knowing my long history of impartiality and me being the opposite of mainstream causing them to have confidence that no conspiracy exists to oppress you or ‘take you down’ as I am independent, just a man who occasionally inserts himself into the national conversation when I determine my contribution useful.
I critique left and right when it is deserved. I have written exposés on J.K. Rowling, a staunch Remainer and Labour Party voter and donor. I have published video exposés pertaining to Mr Roger Hallam who founded Extinction Rebellion. I created ‘Schofieldgate’ as many may remember from my time on Twitter, which led to that man’s eventual removal from the airwaves.
The Biographical Exposé of J.K. Rowling
In regards to Schofieldgate, I was massively attacked at that time and called all sorts of names by the likes of the Hope Not Hate-linked Jay Beecher; yet some months later, everyone else caught up. The truth is often hard to accept at first, which is why all ignored my warnings about the coming invasion of Ukraine, which I tried to prevent, just as I tried to contain COVID within China.
I try to remain impartial, despite not being a journalist or being paid for any of what I do, due to being old-fashioned and caring more about people than partisan politics.
Russell, you need to stop, you are causing great distress to many, including your family. I have often criticised the MSM and personally advocate deglobalisation, as outlined within Defeating Fentanyl, How We Will Create Peace in Ukraine and the World and other recent publications; ergo I am not your enemy, I am not the NWO. There is no NWO, how do I know?
Because I am the foremost international expert on conspiracy theorism and conspiracy theism (combined they form ConjectureMania), which I demonstrate within the works The Truth at Last: 33 Essential Question for Conspiracy Theorists (which disproves every known conspiracy theory) and the upcoming ConjectureMania, which explains the origins of and motivations behind conspiracy theories from a psychological, sociological and historical viewpoint.
True victory for you means no longer soliciting money. Victory means you retiring whilst the authorities do their job, and they can do a better and more expedient job if you are not shouting your innocence from the rooftops whilst insinuating there is a cunning global cabal out to get you. This is clearly, patently false as the UK media are being gagged at the present time.
Russell, if the NWO is all-powerful, how was it that I was able to create the biographical exposé and these videos within only a few short weeks, whereas it took “them” a massive four years of investigating in order to produce the brief televised exposé and related articles?
You have seen what “they” achieved after collectively working for four years together, and you have seen what I have achieved within a few short weeks; doesn’t this tell you something?
Does it not make you think that the world is comprised of individuals, rather than cabals and conspiracies, that we are all just trying to do our best to survive, and that your angst for authority has nothing to do with conspiracies and everything to do with your childhood and that which is inborn?
I am just one man, with no staff, and you have seen what I can do. So imagine what the “NWO” in collaboration with the MSM/legacy media could do, who would have near unlimited resources and huge manpower.…
There will come a point when the cognitive dissonance will be broken; there will come a point where Occam’s razor will compel you to agree with me, that there can be no New World Order and no collusion between government and media and that there is no conspiracy against you because these “all-powerful folk” have no idea how to end conspiracy theorism beyond complete censorship, which will hurt us all, whatever we believe, as a last-ditch attempt to prevent the proliferation of baseless and societally-dangerous conspiracy theories that damage the mental health of the dis-believer whilst threatening public order concurrently.
ConjectureMania (which is the combination of conspiracy theoriesm and theism, the theorist is the priest, he who theorises (maliciously conjectures), with the theists being those who believe in the words of the theorist, his congregation) is a dis-belief system or a hyper-contrarian belief system. Yet, when a person believes in nothing other than disbelief, he becomes detached, he drifts. He then grows angry and due to there not being an NWO or aliens or a conspiracy for him to battle and fight (as these things are fiction), he instead hurts himself as his social life dies, as does his purpose and happiness and joy, replaced by hate and doubt and cognitive dissonance and codependency upon the theorist and his fellow congregants, who he knows are equally as detached and chronically lonely and conflicted and self-doubting and blame-shifting and in denial as he is.
By my understanding, made able by studying this topic for a period of years, I not only know for a certainty that conspiracy theorism/theism is far from being a one-way road (the light at the end of the tunnel is walking away from cynicism/pessimism/disbelief/groupthink, my friends), I also know that, afterwards, those who currently are filled with little else than fear and anxiety will become baptised in truth, logic and individual empowerment, enabling one and all to lead profound lives, lives full of dignity and purpose, happiness and optimism, strength and discovery, evolution and love.
You are, each of you, valuable—and it is not your fate to die before ever proving a single theory. What an inglorious end that would be. I don’t want this for you; no one wants this for you.
To recap: I was right on COVID, right on Brexit, right about Schofield, right about the invasion of Ukraine and I am right also about conspiracy theorism and theism.
Rather than the MSM and “NWO” being all-knowing and “scary”, I have been influencing events and elections by individual will alone.
I alone moved the wheels of government when weak, fence-sitting yes men chose to sit on their hands and gamble, so influenced by big business and the mob were they, just as I alone foresaw the coming calamity of COVID and of the invasion of Ukraine, just as I alone am interceding again now, in the lives of every conspiracy theorist and theist, as it becomes immediately apparent to one and all that you haven’t yet taken the “red pill”, despite you truly believing that fact—because I am the red pill and you know you can trust this prescription.
Russell, everything is in reverse, this is now obvious. I left social media two years ago and removed all my content due to consistently being ignored by those who preferred to bury their heads in the sand, who chose to listen to voices like yours instead. Saying, ‘I told you so,’ becomes tiresome after a while, and watching vulnerable and innocent folk flock to shysters and grifters getting rich whilst achieving cheap catharsis whilst virtue signalling from their internet conspiratorial pulpits is hard to bear witness to.
Rather than continuing butting heads with conspiracy theorists and theists online (I long tried to educate and help these groups directly on an individual and collective basis), which solved nothing, I engaged in two years of writing and intensive research, the culmination of which being my latest publications, which will benefit many across the world with my self-assuredness born out of me ‘not having a dog’ in any of the fights in question. I can help, so I do, as I would hate myself if I did nothing. I would be a coward if I did nothing.
ConjectureMania is a prison, but I have the keys to that prison and if you wish to be released, I guarantee that I can get you out. You are no lesser than I am, it takes an enormous amount of will to remain a disbeliever; the cognitive dissonance is strong in you, profound, as you consume paracetamol manufactured in the same building as COVID vaccines, ingesting one Pfizer product yet actively choosing to reject other Pfizer products. I know your pain, I can remove that pain.
You (conspiracy theorists and conspiracy theists) have had my attention for a long time; now I have yours—thank Russell Brand for this. And do remember, if he attempts to remove my videos or if he seeks to burn my book about him, it will prove that he is the very things he continually professes to stand against: authoritarian, a fascist and an advocate of cancel culture and an enemy of free speech.
Russell, despite my best efforts it is entirely likely that you will ignore this letter, my video series and what could be termed the ‘unauthorised biography’ I wrote about you within the past week after becoming aware of the allegations and thereafter being troubled by your aggressive rebuttal and the vocal minority who have lent you their support also.
Just know, in advance, that remaining on this same course of action will lead to you achieving the opposite of your stated goals: your immediate goals being to maintain your following, to then increase your following, and to potentially generate near one billion dollars of revenue.
If you cannot let go, if you insist on continuing to fight, your following will disappear as your legions of followers become aware of my videos and my book, but not from you as you would hate for them to view this content (of course) as the videos and book paint a new picture of you and I am just getting started. I am what Trump would term ‘high energy’.
Once your followers become aware that not only are you self-silencing and self-censoring by refusing to make a comment to all of the British people achieved via answering the BBC’s (and other media outlets) questions, for instance, but are also failing to mention this series of videos about you or the 100,000+ word book about you, they will jump ship as they come to think you little more than a narcissistic grifter.
There can be no rebuttal to my rebuttal as I have already formulated rebuttals for any and all potential rebuttals. Try telling folk I am the Illuminati; that won’t fly, not for a nanosecond.
My upcoming works are hardly neoliberal, progressive NWO positions. Next to me, it is you who looks like a liberal and a member of the mainstream conformist culture.
We both know you cannot tell your followers about my content as to do so would cause you to lose all of your followers, and if this does in fact end up occurring (you losing circa fifteen million followers as a consequence of my actions) it will not be the fault of globalists or Soros (whom I have often critiqued myself); neither will it be the fault of the UK Government, YouTube, the BBC or the mainstream media, no. Please understand, Russell, that if you suddenly have 0 followers it will be as a direct result of my actions and my actions alone—no one gropes Lorraine Kelly and makes her feel unsafe and powerless when I’m on watch, no one! Not even you.
The logical course of action is to leave the internet. I am publishing this letter and the first four exposé videos on the 15th of January 2024); I will keep this content online until the 22nd of January 2024).
If at that time all your social media accounts and all content have been deleted, if at that time you are no longer soliciting donations/membership fees and if you have fully removed yourself from the minds of millions and millions of vulnerable and scared people, I will happily remove this letter and the video content and will refrain from publishing the remaining videos and the book.
Any other course of action will create the opposite effect of that which you intend to create, with it being wholly predictable that very soon folk will begin requesting refunds from you, especially after watching video no. 1, believing they were misled or miss-sold when they gave you so much money. Lawyers will get involved, then governments; it will become messy and descend into farce. You can avoid all of this easily by simply being silent, your legal right and the honourable thing to do in this hour.
Do the right thing, the right thing for everyone, which will let me get back to what I do best, writing useful books, rather than creating endless exposé videos about a man I’d barely heard of a fortnight ago, and there is so much more to come in these videos.
Capitalism, Money and Eight-Year-Old Girls
In addition to removing yourself from social media, it would be beneficial also, to the health of the nation, if you refrained from making money due to your celebrity status, as in: Stop selling tickets to comedy shows, cancel your ‘community festival’, stop asking for donations, stop asking for membership fees.
In regards to you no longer making money from ad revenue and subscriptions and ticket sales, your previous words (I reference the Guardian interview from October 11th 2014, ‘Russell Brand: I want to address the alienation and despair’) suggest it really won’t be much of a hardship to no longer have new money flowing in your direction.
Was it not you who wore underpants emblazoned with Che Guevara’s face back in 2002 and who wore Che T-shirts and Karl Marx T-shirts also over a period of many years, if not decades? Was it not you who read out a letter from Che to his children in which he urged them to become revolutionaries and non-capitalists?
The Letters Live event (where you read aloud with great passion Che’s letter) was only in 2015, hardly a million years ago.
I doubt you will ever denounce Che or say that you hate him, Marx, communism or left-wing revolutionaries. I doubt you have changed; I am certain Che is still your hero and idol. Your social media followers have no idea who you are, I mean the real you.
Do you desire closed borders? No.
Do you desire regular people’s referendums? No.
Do you desire nationalism? No.
Do you desire majority rule/democracy? No.
If I am wrong, create a video or publish a brief, simple tweet.
Publicly state that you hate socialism; state that you hate Marxism and communism and Che and Lenin; state that you desire closed borders or nationalism or majority rule or as low-as-possible taxes.
You have ever been a follower of Marx and Che, which is why you hate yourself now that you have become surrounded by great wealth and possessions such as your expensive cars, portfolio of multimillion-dollar properties with swimming pools and home cinemas (very revolutionary), your $2500 Yves Saint Laurent cardigans and your $1000 limited edition trainers as it’s rumoured you are seeking to expand your property empire by acquiring yet another holiday home, this time in Kippen, Scotland.
That will be property number five, I believe, in addition to the circa $15,000,000 worth of luxury properties you already own.
(In the video below, from 2015, Russell reads a letter from Che Guevara to his five children, left with his wife to be read on the occasion of his death. Che was executed in 1967 in Bolivia.)
(Che video goes here)
Russell, in the Guardian interview you stated, “I’m going to get a property in East London and set up a coffee and juice bar to be run by people in recovery from addiction … I’m no longer interested in making money. And the money I get, I’m going to use for good. We need systemic change, not charity. I won’t be in charge. They’ll vote for how they want to run it … I don’t know [how much he is worth] but I could probably never be poor again. When I see stuff in the paper like, “Oh, he’s worth £20M quid,” I ain’t worth that much. I don’t know what I’ve done with my money. I’ve sorted my parents out, but all the money now, I’m going to use it for social enterprises. My intention is to dedicate myself to this.”
Russell, you seem to hate money, which is why the recent demonetisation should be welcomed by you, surely? Why would an anti-capitalist want money anyway? It makes no sense.
In the same interview you mention death quite a lot, likely due to you going through a breakup with your then muse Jemima Khan. You state, ‘Yeah, I’m ready to die for it.’ When referencing the revolution you tried to create via the publication of a book, entitled Revolution funnily enough, you also said, ‘No. I’d rather die. I’d rather die than go back to the dark,’ with the dark being a return to Hollywood.
The third time you mention your demise (three times too many) is at the conclusion of the interview:
‘Unless you just want to carry on doing your journalism for the Guardian and moaning about Gordon Brown, get on board when somebody’s prepared to die for something.’
You threatening your death or looking forward to it reminded me about the episode in the boxing ring with your father Ron, when you made him aware that your death, if it were to be premature, would be solely his fault, which would then trigger your mother’s death. I was just about to write my thoughts on the issue and include them within the proposed biography, nearing completion at time of writing (I have so much material to work with, you are a biographer’s dream), but I became instantly distracted by what the journalist Simon Hattenstone wrote next, which I will reproduce here verbatim, unedited:
‘A few days later, Brand turns up at a drop-in for destitute asylum seekers that I am involved with. He arrives, chauffeur-driven in a black Mercedes with tinted windows, poses for any number of photos, flirts with everybody from the age of eight to 80, and listens intently to what they have to say.
‘Of course there are many people who will call Brand a hypocrite and say it is all very well preaching equality when he has a driver, his millions and expensive designer jeans. “Give me a chance to grow,” he pleads. “I’ll continue to improve. But I don’t care what other people think.”’
Russell, in case you did not see what so distracted me, I will explain; it was the part where Simon spoke of you flirting with eight-year-olds. Isn’t your eldest around that age now? By God I hope you have changed. No one, Russell, literally no one on planet Earth wants you to flirt with them, especially not eight-year-olds! Your advances and physical contact and eye contact and closeness are most unwelcomed by everyone.
If you were not famous the police would have been called on hundreds of occasions. If you were a window cleaner or a taxi driver or a sewage worker and flirting with eight-year-olds what do you think would happen to you? Just because you act effeminate and camp and eccentric and because you have been on the TV and radio does not grant you Jimmy Savile-esque immunity, not at all.
Stay away from children; stay away from everyone. You need to learn to respect people; you need to learn about boundaries and what behaviour is acceptable and what is not.
This was a friendly (to you) journalist from a newspaper you were once a contributor to/fellow columnist, The Guardian, writing in late 2014 about you flirting with eight-year-old girls, Russell; this was your comrade, in effect, raising the alarm about your behaviour. And what is interesting is you have almost certainly read the article yet you have not complained about the content. A man who hadn’t flirted with children would have threatened to sue the Guardian immediately unless they edited or deleted the incorrect claim.
I hope this will help convince you as to just how bad, how terrible your behaviour has been over the years. Just watch my video concerning you and the homeless man you shared your flat with temporarily (video 4); you call it sweet and tenderness when forcing him to bathe with you, yet it was the opposite.
Please learn about respect and empathy before approaching another human being, and that includes your family members. You are a danger to yourself and all others presently.
What I find most troubling and concerning about Simon stating you were flirting with eight-year-olds in October 2014 is that only three months earlier you launched an impassioned defence of the convicted and unapologetic paedophile Rolf Harris, seemingly complaining that the media had to mention the age of one of his victims, her age being seven.
Is it that you just love people and are innocent of everything; that your alleged flirtation with eight-year-olds is innocent and loving and your defence of Rolf just three months earlier (you asked what joy or justice anyone could get out of jailing him) is also proof of incredible love and forgiveness? Or is the explanation somewhat darker and grotesque?
The facts are on June 30th, 2014, you came across in mine and I’m sure most people’s opinion as a paedophile apologist with one of Rolf’s victims being seven years of age. Then, only three months later, according to a friendly journalist at the Guardian, who wrote a very neutral piece about you, you are said to be flirting with eight-year-old children. Is this why you ran to Rolf’s defence? Or were the Guardian and Simon lying?
I would suggest that the Guardian newspaper, as a result of the revelations concerning Mr Brand, urgently teaches all journalists to file a police report upon the occasion of witnessing an adult man flirting with eight-year-old children. I can’t help but think that if Russell then identified as a Conservative or a nationalist the Guardian would have made the flirting with eight-year-olds a front-page story, which is a shame and a sad indictment on the partisan nature of our media and society and this is of course how abusers get away with their crimes, hiding behind their royal friends or their political friends or their journalist friends.
Please, whatever your belief system, when you see an adult flirting with children or groping children or being close to children, please tell that person, ‘No! Stop what you’re doing!’
The meme I created below seems to validate Simon’s words, Russell; please stay away from children.
The Exposé Book
Russell, I have written a one-hundred-thousand-word biographical exposé about you over these past weeks, none of which focuses on the current allegations so in no way could be considered contempt of court. (I am aware of the attorney general’s warning in this regard, I am stepping on no toes here, my actions and the content of that work would in no way prejudice a trial.) My primary focus is on your childhood, your formative years and how the culture at the BBC following the rise of New Labour facilitated the “lad culture”, which you were an ambassador of and proponent of, to your shame.
The Biographical Exposé of Russell Brand
The book is eye-opening as well as deeply informative as it explains the consequences of absentee parents and those deficient in nurture or love. It covers such diverse topics as mental illnesses, personality disorders and the effects of pornography on young minds and of shy teenage boys losing their virginity in the bed next to their father who was at the same time having sex with two prostitutes, as was the case with you, my friend, as I have learnt during the course of my investigation.
You were always destined to self-destruct with your conspiracy theorism being but a symptom of a far deeper unhappiness and angst as a result of historic trauma, crimes, abuses and injustices, all of which I cover in detail within the book in question, which will finally explain why you became the man you have become.
As I mentioned, I do not cover the recent allegations, merely this book is psychoanalytical, biographical and contains my thoughts, my observations and opinions after observing you at great length for the past two weeks or so (reading articles, reading your books, watching hundreds of your videos). I have conducted various exposés in the past and all bore fruit, just as this one has also, with the revelations contained within this work truly shocking and surprising.
In addition to the book, I have produced companion videos that focus heavily upon your nonverbal communication, your eyes, why you make so much eye contact, what causes you to become ‘triggered’ and a delve into your narcissism and desire to be thought of or treated as though you are divine. The remainder of the videos are not comedic, or not as comedic at least. You have to keep laughing, don’t you, especially in these times of conflict, recession, pandemics and war? I always sport a smile.
If you ask me not to publish the book and if you ask me not to publish the videos or demand that I do not publish these things without you making a real change in your life, a positive change, I will publish regardless as I did in the case of my ‘Rowling Trilogy’ where I published not one but three books, which that far wealthier (and formidable) Brit did not desire to be published in any way whatsoever due to the content found therein.
Those books were published years ago and are still available for sale on Amazon to this day, including How Not to Get Sued by J.K. Rowling.
You only don’t know about that trilogy due to me not crowing about those books because I am not a zealot and due to me not spending a penny on advertising as I don’t need money from book sales and those books, it appears, served their intended purpose as the once famously litigious author has now mellowed somewhat in that regard.
I hope this trend continues along with the waning of her penchant for donating large sums of money to political causes, something I complained about at length within the book One Election Please: How J.K. Rowling Bought British Politics, Hid Her True Self and Hoodwinked the World, an Unauthorised Biographical Exposé.
What I am attempting to articulate here is the billionaire Rowling and her legions of the very best lawyers could not prevent me from publishing any of my content, so what chance have you got?
Yet, do not lose heart as there is a way for you to miraculously prevent the publication of the next nine videos in the exposé series; there is a way for you to prevent the publication of the book and there is also a way for you to have the first exposé videos removed from the internet immediately.
All that is required is for you to delete all of your social media accounts and leave the internet, permanently. A fair trade.
In exchange, I will delete my videos, refrain from sharing the other videos and will happily delete the book in question from existence. You may be able to remove a video or two from certain sites, yet if an attempt is made to “cancel” me, you can imagine my response. I will become very loud and very vocal and the content will certainly continue to be published via a myriad of means worldwide until everyone has had chance to view the content—and I will gladly make the book available free of charge also, to one and all, if you attempt to stifle my free speech or proliferate censorship.
Could I make thousands or millions of pounds, dollars or euros from the sale of the biographical psychoanalytical exposé?
Yes.
Do I care if I lose that money if you do the right thing, the caring thing and empathic thing and grown-up thing, which is to remove yourself from public life completely, which includes cancelling yourself completely from social media?
No.
I would gladly pay that cost as you (and your family, friends and those who care about you) are less happy even than the throngs of vulnerable folk you cause to become ever more anxious and paranoid and suspicious via your current output.
If all of your social media accounts remain active after Monday the 22nd of January I will assume you wish to remain online and keep your social media accounts, in which case I will be publishing the next 30 minutes (two videos) of the video exposé on that day. Soon thereafter the other videos will follow as will the biographical exposé.
You had a choice after the investigations and the recent exposés and allegations; you chose to continue doing what you have been doing.
I then had a choice, either to ignore my gut and ignore your odd reaction to the allegations (your rebuttal videos, I am a master in terms of reading and interpreting nonverbal communication, I have studied those videos with a fine-tooth psychological comb and found much) or to do something about what I had observed in you—and my modus operandi is normally writing a book or creating a satirical video production.
Your choice provoked me to make a choice, and now my choice is provoking you to make a choice:
Remain on the same irresponsible, tone-deaf and juvenile monotropistic course or change fundamentally and profoundly by embracing hitherto unimagined new heights of humility and self-sacrifice and true altruism via the deletion of your doom-spreading, nihilism and cynicism-proliferating vanity distraction and fantasy delusion, aka your social media accounts and followership, and instead immediately focus the sum total of your time, energy and effort at home, giving all of your attention and nurture and talent and energy to your children and wife and close friends and family, who want you to break free and become the real you.
Do this and I will never speak of you again. Do this and I will delete the exposé videos. Do this and no one will ever read that book. Do this and finally you will become a real man and will be blessed for the remainder of your life, finally your own master—fearless, unbound, calm, in control and joyous.
The Blue Comedian Who Defeated the CIA, FBI, MI5, MI6, FSB, MOSSAD, the MSM, Big Pharma, Capitalism, the Metropolitan Police, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Pentagon, the US Government and the UK Government…
Think about the above, Russell. Think about the long-reaching ramifications of you being able to survive the slew of allegations made against you without there being a custodial sentence being involved or financial settlements being required to be made.
You state you believe there is an “agenda” at play. You suggest a conspiracy exists to take you out—you, a blue comedian who wears Che Guevara underpants (see exposé video number 4); you who required your father to attend the launch of the Trew Era Cafe (presumably for moral support) despite being the author of the Revolution book, despite being old enough at the time to be a father or even a grandfather yourself.
Your whole shtick, since your very profitable rebranding, is that everyone should question everything, that everyone should be on guard and vigilant and not be so quick to trust the most intelligent people on the planet—scientists, military leaders, business leaders, etc.
You continually claim that folk should fear governments and corporations and mistrust the mainstream media and you allude to there being nefarious agendas and conspiracies. You flirt with conspiracy theorism, not going all in, saying that you categorically don’t believe in the flat earth theory or Icke’s ‘royal lizard theory’. (In your interview with Miranda Sawyer, 9th of November 2008, you are quoted as saying, ‘David Icke is great, though he loses me when it comes to “the lizards”.’) Yet you do, in a cringe-inducing fashion, flirt with the general paranoid idea of conspiracy theorism, the anxiety-inducing and fear-spreading musings of scared and powerless-feeling self-sabotaging folk full of envy and angst and all too often abject hate.
So are you right? Are they? That we should all be scared, terrified even, of the “NWO” and of the power of corporations and governments? Only if you are sent to prison for fifty years and all your assets seized and every one of your social media followers arrested and interrogated in the bowels of the Pentagon by “men in black” types.
If you are not prosecuted, if you do not spend a single night in a prison cell, and if you are still able to, even after twenty or thirty years, continue to propagate your theories (in actual fact, you are merely the echo chamber for the fear, envy and paranoia-driven, angered musings of detached and antisocial narcissists and sociopaths), it will mean that THERE IS NOTHING TO FEAR!
I believe this has already been established by the fact that you are still, at time of writing, at liberty and continuing your crusade to spread fear and mistrust, an agent for anarchy, an agent for individualism and anti-stateism, an agent of chaos; a man-child throwing his toys out the pram because Hollywood didn’t love him and because Katy Perry wouldn’t bear him a child.
How much of the trash you speak online you believe is hard to know as you are an actor. You are a false prophet full of self-interest who wears the mask of the saviour, the messiah, the compassionate narcissist. Yet, if you do believe that the NWO is all-powerful and dangerous, if you do believe that we should all fear the media and government and corporations, will you still think this way if, like David Icke, you find yourself being able to continue your anger towards the state, the current order, the mainstream media, the status quo and the established hierarchy and orthodoxy and culture and reality decade after decade without being “disappeared” or beamed up to a UFO? Icke called the royals lizards; you said he was wrong about that. How do you think the royals felt about Icke? Why does he still breathe? Why is he at liberty? Because he is wrong, like you say, like most say. He is wrong, just as you are wrong. If he was right, if you were right, the ”bad guys” would have paid you both a visit a long, long time ago….
You, like most folk who take advantage of vulnerable and isolated and scared and detached folk looking for answers and “truth” by shouting your cynicism and nihilism and fear and anxiety and depression and mistrust and paranoia from the rooftops, desire to be thought of as a martyr, a hero, a victim of the evil forces (the alphas at the top) so you nip at their heels in the hopes that they will nip back in order to make your delusions and fantasies come true as you are seeking out fights. You are seeking out conflicts because you are angry, just like when you get angry at your wife (she claims) when she refuses to join in with your experimental hyperventilating breathing exercises (see the exposé videos).
You say the media are bad guys and the state is a bad guy and corporations and capitalism are bad guys, but the only bad guy I see is you. By your own admission you refuse to help out with the rearing of your children (‘I’m too sensitive’ you shamefully and embarrassingly crow, thinking yourself in need of being nannied and pampered yourself), many have previously complained about this when this revelation came to light I have recently discovered.
This makes you an irresponsible and bad father, I hope you realise, just as echoing the paranoid conjectures of unhappy sociopaths similarly makes you a bad father, just as claiming there is an agenda at play to take you out makes you a bad father, just as spending all of your time online rather than with your children makes you a bad father, just as forcing your wife to do things she clearly hates repeatedly makes you a bad husband, just as the dozen or more times you have been arrested in multiple nations makes you a bad person and a bad citizen.
In your attempt at proving you are the victim, the perpetual victim who is always hard done by and bullied and under the thumb of the big guys in the ivory towers, you have proved the exact opposite to be true as many weeks after the documentary on Channel 4 in the UK and the articles in the Times were published you can freely travel within the UK or travel worldwide. You can continue broadcasting your messages to millions of followers; you can stand for election; you can do anything. You are incredibly free and privileged and entitled. You are amazingly free and at liberty and alive, so tell me; where is the agenda?
Why are you and Icke at liberty? Could it be that we don’t need to fear our own security services and institutions and media as much as you claim we need to? Could it be that the only agenda is for responsible, hard-working and dutiful people to carry out their jobs and roles and tasks in the interest of keeping civilisation moving forward and these dutiful folk see you and Icke as angst-ridden atypical unfortunates who refuse to grow up or embrace humility, who need constant attention on almost a cellular level, so they do not throw you into the Tower of London due to understanding you and empathising? Could it be that the folk ‘at the top’ are not trying to suppress you, do not wish to persecute or police you, but care about you and want to prove to you that you have nothing to fear (because in all of recorded history a conspiracy theorist has never been executed, has never been tortured, has never been “disappeared”)?
Just because a man struggles to function in social settings, just because a man has a learning disability or incredible insecurities and shyness and an absence of confidence or self-belief or whose neurodivergency precludes him from advancing through the ranks of academia or the military or the media or in Hollywood or in any number of fields and disciplines does not mean there is an agenda to punish and persecute and dominate and defeat him.
If a blue comedian is able to come out the other end of this a free man, that blue comedian cannot ever claim the NWO exists; nor can he ever tell people to fear the “unholy union of the US and UK and the security services and Big Pharma and corporations in tandem with the media and Bill Gates”; nor can he ever claim an “agenda” exists.
Rather, that blue comedian will be forced to apologise for scaring tens of millions of people, risking the lives of countless folk, and potentially causing the untimely deaths of untold thousands due to continually questioning pharmaceutical companies that produce life-saving vaccines.
Russell, please know that you have likely demotivated folk from getting vaccinated. Do you remember when you gave out that advice to unvaccinated folk in regards to attending your blue comedy gig at the height of the COVID pandemic in the UK? I do. Rules exist for a damn good reason, Russell, and it is your refusal to follow the rules that has led to you being arrested multiple times in multiple nations, long before you ever muttered a single word about conspiracies or conspiracy theories.
Is a blue comedian really ‘taking on’ the US and UK Governments and Big Pharma and all corporations and the mainstream media and so many billionaires and those with vested interests in the continuation of capitalism as it currently exists? How absurd does that sound? Wouldn’t the blue comedian (if he needed his father to be there when he opened his cafe a few short years ago and who recently hired security guards and erected privacy screening at his pub) be terribly afraid if he believed that all these powerful entities and unions and corporations and systems and individuals were all joined together in a conspiracy to take him out? Wouldn’t he be terribly scared, and contrite, passive even, and seeking to mend bridges?
Wouldn’t the blue comedian suddenly ‘see the light’ and make a public statement to the effect of, ‘After the documentary and the articles in the Times, I have to confess that there was a lot of darkness in my past. I have been unhappy in the past and lost to drugs and alcohol. I apologise for my behaviour, much of which I cannot remember due to being under the influence. I will respect the decision of the police and the CPS and will of course comply with any requests made by the police or courts at home or abroad to answer for my previous actions and behaviour. I believe justice should be done. I believe in the system and I want others to have full faith in the system and in justice. Out of respect for the process and investigations, for the foreseeable future I shall refrain from making further public comments, which means my social media accounts will be suspended until further notice.’
Russell, the blue comedian facing persecution from “unbeatable” international foes who genuinely believed he was being singled out and that an “agenda” existed to take him out would have certainly reacted in this way, certainly, without a doubt.
Going on the attack and doubling down, lashing out more than ever before does not prove you are scared, it proves the opposite. Are you trying to intimidate the NWO and the Illuminati? Are you trying to intimidate the CIA and MI5? You are but a blue comedian who upsets your wife (the Wim Hof breathing thing), admits to refusing to help out with the kids and who makes paranoid and vulnerable and delusional folk online believe that their unfounded fears and anxieties and delusions and paranoia are well founded whilst making money from being a pseudo fence-sitting conspiracy theorist.
Try, I implore you, to be patriotic and dutiful, which means being silent now. If you wish to help people, stop talking. If you wish to be selfless, stop forcing your wife to do Wim Hof breathing. Try to be more tolerant and humble and rein in your ego as it is the beast that will destroy you, your family and any chance you will ever have of being happy and fulfilled. Try also to live in the real world, this world, rather than being an eternal existentialist escaper from reality, from responsibility and from duty.
Ask yourself, Russell; what would you do if your following reduced to zero tomorrow? If all your followers read this letter and watched my amateurish video productions and read my book on conspiracy theories, which debunks every last one of them. What would you do, Russell, if there was no point in you continuing to proliferate conspiracy theories and spread fear and mistrust? What would you do, Russell, if no one listened to you anymore?
You would be forced to wake up, to grow up and be a man, which are the things you avoid for so long as you continue chirping online about agendas and conspiracies and Bill Gates and corporations as you come across as little more than bitter, envious and a monumental blame-shifter. If you no longer had conspiracy theorism, you would be forced to get your house in order, wouldn’t you? What excuse would you give to your wife thereafter when you refused to help out with the kids or insisted on upsetting her? There would be no excuse, so you have to go on pretending to be a hero and freedom fighter and an essential overseer of governments, corporations and the media; the blue comedian who moonlights as the saviour of mankind and the liberator of minds.
Memes and More Memes…
I am not immune to the modern online culture of memes, which is why I have created a ‘rap video’ meme today; you will see it on my website (brucemasters.org) shortly, if you insist on remaining online. I have previously made such humorous rap parodies about Boris Johnson and David Lammy, what a trio you three make.
In addition to that production, I have created a few dozen regular memes with many of them featuring photos where you are having close physical contact with children, which most will find troubling, especially considering your long-time defence of paedophiles and downplaying of the dangers of paedophilia, which I touch upon at length within the exposé videos.
The more your supporters online defend you by attacking me the more of these memes I shall publish, with all of the information I will publish already being in the public domain. I am merely reproducing already published materials, yet these memes will have the certain end result of decreasing your followership massively.
I made a meme of the American actor Smollett some years back, which mocked and ridiculed him after claiming he was ‘almost lynched’ by some crazed white supremacist types in downtown Chicago in the middle of winter, which was immediately debunked. The caption I placed below that meme was, ‘When the lies stop, so will the memes.’ This applies to you also. When your belligerency and childishness stop, so will the memes.
Why Are the Exposé Videos So Satirical and Retrospective?
It is apt, is it not, that there is comedy, albeit dark comedy, infused into these various productions, given that Brand is a comedian and all—who, despite being unnecessarily crude and crass, has great timing and is a great entertainer, it must be said, who works incredibly hard when he chooses to.
I enjoy satire, especially political satire; see my books David Lammy on the Run, a Political Comedy Adventure and J.K. Rowling in: It’s a Kind of Magic for immediate confirmation. It is a very British thing, very much a Punch thing and Spitting Image thing to use comedy to make serious points, and some of the subjects I touch upon in this exposé series are really quite serious. It would be dark and stark without the attempts at comedy.
In regards to being retrospective, and in part focusing on the Brand from twenty years ago, this is intended not for his or the police’s or courts’ consumption but for his recent conservative and right-wing followership’s consumption. This Brand they have not seen; this Brand they will not approve of or tolerate; this Brand will be hard for them to watch or stomach, which increases the chances of Brand’s following massively decreasing, which will reduce the number of conspiracy theists in the world, a win for all.
I did not compel Brand to use and abuse prostitutes (I cite the spitting in the face of a prostitute incident here, see his autobiography, there are other incidents also). I did not compel him only nine years ago to make that bizarre video where he came across in my opinion as a staunch paedophile apologist. I did not tell him to discourage folk from voting. I did not encourage him to demean and traumatise that poor homeless recovering drug addict in the bath and to tell him he ‘wanted to have trench foot’ (of course he didn’t want to suffer painful trench foot, you dolt!). Nor did I force him to go into that toilet with that Buddhist gentleman (video 4).
Brand, an adult man with rights and privileges and education, chose to do these things, a man who is a multimillionaire, who has previously said he will never be poor again, who owns a portfolio of multimillion-dollar properties in multiple nations and several businesses, who has enjoyed huge personal success, who is a multi-time published author and columnist who is smart enough, intelligent enough and capable enough to have, by his wit and will, become a member of the 1%.
Brand has always been in control, he has insisted on always being in control, even if it makes those around him miserable and causes them to flee. So if Brand is embarrassed by the re-publication of older content, the fault is not mine but his as he chose to do the things he did and he has no one to blame other than himself. Yet, still I foresee an attempt at censorship, litigation even, if he does not accept my offer, my most unusual yet generous and amicable offer.
Become the Revolutionary…
Currently, Russell, what’s the chief difference between you and me?
We are both authors, we both dabble with comedy and are both interested in politics and social affairs and are both of the working class. It seems we are quite similar beasts, so is there a difference and, if so, what is it?
The difference between us is if I discover someone has created an unauthorised copy of one of my books and is selling that book for profit, be it the book Defeating Fentanyl, which does what it says on the tin, or my book The Truth at Last: 33 Essential Questions for Conspiracy Theorists, which will end the majority of conspiracy theorism on the planet, or 69 Excuses to Drink Alcohol and 1 Reason not to or Ending the Migrant Crisis in Europe or How We Will Create Peace in Ukraine and the World, I will not complain, neither will I sue, neither will I become angered in any way whatsoever. Rather I will merely state that ‘to guarantee you are reading the original and unaltered versions of my books, it is always recommended to obtain them from trusted and recommended sources’, recommended by myself.
However, how will you react if individuals, companies or even states begin mass-producing your autobiographies or your book Revolution without sending any royalties your way?
It is obvious that (at the present time) you will react very badly indeed, there will likely be court cases and litigation immediately, absolutely immediately—because you are not revolutionary or free or awakened.…
Ironically, it is my strong belief that if you were to voluntarily leave social media/the internet/public life for good, it would compel many folk to seek out your books and to pay whatever sum you demanded for them as then and only then would you be taken seriously as that act (gracefully bowing out) would send a strong and resounding signal that you have matured finally and embraced humility and stoicism and duty and self-sacrifice. Then and only then would you be thought of as being anything like a hero or a revolutionary or a lover of humanity or lover of his tribe and nation.
Imagine the headlines: ‘Multimillionaire multi-property owner and one-percenter Russell Brand sues poor people who made unauthorised copies of his book Revolution in an attempt to put food on their table during a time of great poverty and austerity and recession and destitution.’ Who would call that a revolutionary and socialistic and heroic move?
Yet, it seems obvious that you would sue, that you would involve lawyers, that you would vehemently defend your copyright and demand to be the only authorised seller of your written works, even if the unauthorised copies served the purpose of proliferating your various messages and sentiments far and wide.
If you can tolerate no longer being famous, if you can tolerate folk infringing your copyright, if you can tolerate stepping down from your privilege-rich and bourgeois high horse by removing yourself and your ego from social media and by accepting that your voice is just one of many and that the world will survive just fine without any single man or woman, including you, then you will have finally understood what it means to be a human, and a shepherd, and responsible, and loving and a revolutionary.
You have lawyers, you have businesses, you had (up until recently) agents and managers and publishers and a dozen members of staff—hardly revolutionary, Russell, the opposite I would say. You are playing by the rules of the system you have long sought to take down. It seems as though you are in this system, this debt and credit and capitalistic, consumerist, interconnected and globalist system, for the long-haul. You are ‘in it to win it’. You could have purchased a modest £100,000 home in the UK, yet you chose to buy what has been reported as a £4,000,000 home ($5,100,000 USD).
Who are you trying to impress and why? Who are you trying to hurt or embarrass and why? Is this need or is it want? Is this humility or is it greed and elitism?
Do you not realise that true leftist revolutionaries consider folk who own £4,000,000 properties as the definition of anti-revolutionaries and the chief defenders of the current system and order? Would Antifa folk smile when taking in the enormity and splendour and lavishness of your various multimillion-dollar properties in multiple nations? Of course not; ergo, not revolutionary … because a revolutionary would allow all to reproduce his book titled Revolution, right? Right? Right.
Be the revolutionary you have long fantasied about becoming, be the sober man you have long fantasied about becoming, as currently you are neither of these things but a child pretending to be these things. You get richer by the day, not very revolutionary.
You are addicted to social media, you are addicted to transcendental meditation, you are addicted to fame, and you are addicted to controversy and risk. You are not sober. You are drifting, which would be fine if you did not have a family and impressionable vulnerable folk hanging on your every word online, yet you have a family and followers and do them a disservice when you pretend you are sober and revolutionary and a hero.
Will I care about you in any way whatsoever if you remain online after you have read this letter? No. You will become persona non grata to me and to countless others also. Yet, if you choose to be revolutionary and brave and selfless by doing the two things that will hurt the most (being silent and becoming completely sober) I will be forced to respect the new you, as will so many others, for so long as you remain silent and sober—and your book sales will likely soar as a result.
You can’t be a revolutionary whilst loving money and possessions and property portfolios and expensive cars and being someone who will likely sue poor and starving folk who make unauthorised copies of Revolution, can you? Or would your litigation be means tested? Would you ask the copyright infringers about their financial status before destroying their lives and bankrupting them? Your lawyers would mock you; the judge would call you a timewaster.
Russell, what would your opinion be of a man named Rodriguez Brando who wrote a book titled My Revolution who was a one-percenter with untold millions in the bank who preached revolution but insisted he be the only man able to profit from the sale of his book My Revolution?
You would very much dislike that man, wouldn’t you, Russell? You would have great disdain for that man and think him full of fear and anxiety, a charlatan, insanely greedy, a narcissistic grifter and hypocritical or just through and through false and attention-seeking and a man-child, right? Or am I wrong? Would you applaud Rodriguez Brando when you saw him at the High Court shedding tears as he recounted the trauma caused to him when learning that others were profiting from the sale of his book My Revolution? Would he be your hero, Russell? Would he be anyone’s hero? No.
Imagine Marx bankrupting and attempting to jail, vilify, mock, scold and ruin a man who dared to produce unauthorised copies of The Communist Manifesto, just imagine it. What would that make Marx? Yes, that’s right: an enemy of the revolution, due to his actions causing fewer copies of his book to be in existence and circulation.
If everything you are doing and have done has failed and you find yourself constantly getting in trouble, you need to change because it is all well and good when a spotty teenager is full of angst about being grounded and having bedtimes, yet you are a man now, but you do not act as such. For you there is only one means of growing up and that means is to allow one and all to copy and distribute Revolution and to latterly retire, without commenting on this letter or on the exposé videos, or ever again on conspiracy theories. You have said enough, done enough; it’s enough Russell, it’s enough.
Become a man, become a revolutionary man, or stand against justice and remain what most would consider little more than a greedy, anti-revolutionary, litigating scared mouse living in mansions whilst delivering self-righteous pseudo-sermons to poor people online whilst patting himself on the back and counting his money.
I have just written two articles, Russell, one that talks of the upcoming exposé videos and how I find it regrettable that you have chosen the route of absolute self-destruction by choosing to remain online and the old you and a second where I congratulate you for growing up and embracing humility and wisdom following the deletion of all your social media accounts. Which one do you want me to publish?
I desire to publish the second one. The one in which I call upon the media to acknowledge that what you have done is brave and revolutionary and patriotic and dutiful. The sixteen-year-old nihilist Russell wants me to publish the first article, doesn’t he?
The Russell who wants enemies, the Russell who wants a fight, the Russell who wants to, in a Joker-esque fashion, watch the world burn, who has a death wish, who seeks to ever fight and rage and escape wants me to continue this exposé. Yet, the father in you, the father you could become (without your celebrity) desires me to publish the second version of the article in which I declare I will never mention your name again, never answer questions about you, and in which I encourage folk not to gloat or to consider your self-cancellation as a defeat or a retreat or a loss for you but a victory for all of us, a victory for your family, and the only therapy that stands any chance of healing you mind, body and soul.
Is There an Agenda? A Conspiracy to Silence Brand?
Proof that you are not the victim of a global conspiracy as you suggest you might be:
You often speak about agendas and believe one of your videos has caused the might of the MSM and the USA and the UK and Big Pharma and “corporations” and the police and all the various systems and state employees and journalists to all conspire together in secret to “take you out”. I will disprove these claims within a few minutes only:
I have witnessed your followers viciously attacking those who have complained to journalists or the police about your past behaviour, including some various serious allegations. Incredibly cruel and undeserved things have been said, reprehensible things, with many being called frauds and liars, with the mass insinuation among your followership being that they are all being paid by this big global conspiracy to lie, in an attempt to smear you and to bring you down. How absurd, how incredibly absurd, let me explain.
The budget of the CIA is HUGE, as are the budgets of MI5 and MI6. With that in mind, is this really the best these folk can do? Currently there are half a dozen complaints of a historical nature being made against you, with it largely being ‘he said/she said’. I am not aware of there being any actual physical evidence, beyond some reported text messages in one case, yet I am not privy to such things, so maybe there is more hard evidence than I am aware of.
Are you telling me that the security services of the UK could not fake a recent crime? Are you telling me that, if you were such a monumental threat to the state, the security services wouldn’t have one, two or five of their female employees come forward to the police, posing as victims, in tandem with massive amounts of fake physical evidence including doctored CCTV footage?
This is the problem with the cries of ‘conspiracy, conspiracy,’ because if “they” wanted you gone you would be gone, you only want there to be a conspiracy. (“They” is actually us, by the way, the CIA, MI5, MI6. This is us, these are our folk, our people and patriots, not aliens, not enemies of the US or UK!)
Why would the best and most Machiavellian minds in the world ‘take you out’ by releasing a documentary and a newspaper article? It makes no sense; in fact, I observe that your following on YouTube only increased thereafter.
The fact that you are not in prison today disproves that you are the victim of a global conspiracy. And here is the reason why the state, no state, fears you Russell: Because you are profiting from spreading conspiracy theories and anti-state rhetoric. Do you not still receive royalties from the publication of your book, Revolution for instance?
A revolutionary seeking to profit from his revolution, a “truth seeker who seeks to awaken people to the truth” seeking to profit from waking people up is commonly referred to as a grifter, as a snake oil salesman, as a disingenuous, gaslighting and deceiving, attention-seeking fellow and no threat to anyone as he loves money and fame too much to ever come close to actually threatening mass destabilisation and revolution. How much did your Land Rover Defender cost again? Was it $120,000 or $140,000? Che Guevara mark 2 you ain’t.
When you state that you are being targeted and an agenda is at work (seemingly involving our security services and our state), you embarrass our security services, you make them look lame and foolish and frankly inept due to you still being at large in the community. What you are doing now is unpatriotic, it is a disgusting spectacle to witness, which is why I am involving myself in this matter at this stage, because you are not on MI5’s radar, because they don’t care about former actors with a chip on their shoulder using their celebrity status and face recognition to make a few pieces of silver online whilst lashing out embarrassingly at Daddy all the while because the pandemic was inconvenient for them and prevented them visiting their multimillion-pound luxury second or third home in Hollywood. No, they don’t even know you exist.
If you were never an actor or stand-up comedian, you would have 200 followers maximum on YouTube and be known as ‘that strange man who stuck up for Rolf Harris (the convicted celebrity paedophile) when he was jailed for paedophilia. Without your celebrity, you would most likely be a nobody or in a secure psychiatric ward somewhere, a prison or worse.
What non-celebrity could get away with touching and kissing so many children as you have over the years? (Evidenced in upcoming videos).
What non-celebrity could be accused of so many crimes over so many years without being jailed?
What non-celebrity could force their wife to engage in acts she loathes so much, which terrify and traumatise her (I reference Wim Hof breathing, see video 3), without being jailed?
It seems clear to me that you have ever abused your power, you have ever abused your position of trust.
You should feel ashamed of yourself as you have become that which you have long professed to hate: elite, entitled, mega wealthy and a member of the landed gentry who only cares about your own happiness and gratification, even if that means your wife must cry and beg for you to stop forcing her to do things she absolutely hates.
You feel as though she should acquiesce to your will due to being your wife, just as you thought the homeless man you traumatised and scared off should submit to you grooming and washing him and shaving him, despite him being clean shaven and showing you earlier in the video the place where he has showers and is able to maintain his hygiene. He needed no such assistance from you, nor control; these are humans, Russell, not dolls, not possessions, not things—humans.
Russell, the CIA and MI5 and MI6 are not your enemies. You are your enemy and you are the enemy of truth and justice and of responsibility and accountability and honour and duty and patriotism at the present time.
You need to now be very quiet, amazingly quiet, for all our sakes, including your own. It is enough, we have heard enough; you are a broken record, a hypocritical, self-adoring, elitist and power-mad broken record who hurts everyone around him, who is a danger to all, because you only care about number one. You can never put the state and people first, which is why you would have but a small handful of followers were it not for you being a celebrity beforehand, achieved only as a result of being crude and appealing to the most base desires and lusts of the mob, bravo.
Stop gaslighting and stop pretending to be “against the rich” as you are rich, you live the life of a lord. You likely knew the house you purchased for circa £4M in England was previously owned by a member of the royal family. You likely know also that the late queen exclusively drove Land Rover Defenders on her estates and the name of the pub you purchased is likely not a coincidence either, it having royal connotations.…
When Daddy (the system/state/capitalism) has given you everything, absolutely everything, why would you continue attacking Daddy? Is this cheap catharsis and a means to get an adrenaline rush and shock attention really so important? Even if the consequence is your family being miserable and unhappy and your followers being gaslighted and led astray and demotivated and ever more anti the system that gave you your pub and multiple houses and multiple businesses and your expensive cars and the means to sell your books and products ?
Grow up, Russell, stop shouting like a fool, non-Brits will think you are normal, that you are an ‘average Brit’, rather than being the exact opposite and not someone anyone in their right mind would ever ask to babysit their child or their pet, even before the recent allegations came to light. Think about that, think about it. If no one would trust you to look after their children, why should you be allowed to share your delusions and angst and paranoia with millions?
Grow up, Russell. The security services (unsung heroes doing their duty) and capitalism aren’t the problem, you are. Your titanic ingratitude is the problem, your complete lack of humility is the problem, your dishonourable and bullying nature and over-inflated ego and profound insecurities are the problem, your eternal childishness is the problem, and we have all had enough. Grow up, Russell.
Just be honest, Russell, be honest with yourself and with the British public. Admit that you desperately want to be king, that you have a deep need to be king and to ‘become Daddy’, to ‘become authority’ so you can do what you want with impunity, so that you can avoid rules and judgement and morality and accountability. And it is because you are not king that you attack the system, attack the state, damage democracy, encourage folk not to vote, undermine all our systems and that which creates cohesion and union because you are angst-ridden that you know you will never be king.
Be honest, Russell, it is because you know you cannot lead, because you know no one would ever vote for you, because you would destroy the realm within mere days, that you lash out and lash out due to your own inner failings, due to your inability to silence your ego, due to you allowing yourself to continually be defined by your childhood, a perpetual man-child lost to hedonism and escapism and fantasies and delusions, voluntarily detached from society, from community and from reality.
Grow up, Russell, and be honest. You don’t hate authority, you just hate that you aren’t authority.
You need to read my book The Truth at Last: 33 Essential Question for Conspiracy Theorists, it will explain much about your psyche, your motivations and why you are very wrong about a great many things. It exists to help folk such as you, help, educate and rehabilitate.
You are akin to the unhappy drunk husband and father who kicks the family dog when aggrieved that he has a dead-end job and is envious of the younger and more successful and acclaimed men around him, so he takes it out on his innocent dog; when Laura said you were angry and screaming, I hope you realise that it made her the dog in that scenario.
What is your legacy currently? Question everything, be suspicious, question everything, don’t trust anybody. What an inglorious future will be created if you win, all anarchy, all chaos, all fear and delusions and mistrust and individualism. Think ahead and think of others. When I critique you, when I critique politicians (on the left and right), I do so to improve our world, improve our communities and societies. What is your motivation? How are you improving anything? How are you helping? If everyone listened to you and followed you, how would the whole be improved? I do not reference catharsis or ego, I mean really, tangibly, how are you improving this world of ours? You are not; you are hurting everyone from your vulnerable followers, to your wife and children, your friends and extended family, your neighbours and so many others also. Grow up, Russell, grow up.
In regards to trying to change everything and smash systems and states, sometimes things are the way they are for a very important reason, reasons beyond your comprehension but not beyond the comprehension of responsible and dutiful others, who you rely on for your continuing happiness and survival. These are the same folk you continually attack.
The Choice Is Yours, Not Mine—Actions Have Consequences
If your ego and narcissism can tolerate you deleting your Rumble and Twitter and YouTube and Facebook and Instagram accounts, there is hope for you yet, and if you manage this epic feat before I can publish the next instalment, it will prove to you and to all that you can weather any storm or future privation or conflict and that you can grow, change and evolve once finally given boundaries and leadership rather than forever more being defined by your childhood, forever living in the past, fragmented, disordered, panicked and controlled by your emotions as you continue to be crushed under the weight of the expectations and demands of your scared and angry audience, crippled by having to endlessly perform like a slave as you achieve cheap catharsis by ranting into cold, soulless cameras in cold, soulless rooms, detached from humanity and from yourself. What do your children want? For Daddy to live on the internet or to spend all his time with them?
We both know the answer. Be a man; delete all of your content and social media accounts within the hour. You are only the linchpin of your own life, not of the world.
Making this change will only strengthen and empower and improve you mind, body and soul as you begin smiling and laughing again, as you begin getting more sleep, as you begin living in a real, authentic, natural and healthy manner for the first time in your life. And all will be well afterwards, the fear and pressure and weight of responsibility and anxiety will all slip away. You are so close to becoming free, Russell, so close.
Second chances are rare, seize this one with both hands by hitting ‘delete’. Take the real red pill; return to your family, return to humanity and thus defeat all your demons—and the past, and cynicism, depression, nihilism, self-doubt and fear will never find you again.
You don’t need the internet and the internet doesn’t need you, but your loved ones need you. Your wife needs you, your friends need you and your children and pets need you, so go to them, and stay with them. Choose love and hope, choose self-actualisation and transcendence, rather than teenage defiance and petulance—becoming a man is a choice. For you to become a man requires you to voluntarily leave the internet and the minds of millions of impressionable and vulnerable folk; the alternate course of action (remaining online) is not what one would expect from a man and father but from a defiant and rebellious child.
We will all know if you have chosen to grow up because your social media accounts will hurriedly be deleted and all trace of you from the internet expunged at your own request.
A short while later, this letter and the exposé videos shall be deleted.
I am a man of my word. I offered Rowling fair terms also, I suggest you read How Not to Get Sued by J.K. Rowling, which will reassure you as to my intent, honesty and character—my 60,000-word biographical exposé about Joanne suddenly increased to 83,000 words after my initial outreach to her was treated with disdain.
My response to belligerency from you will likely result in the same thing, which I would prefer to avoid as I have other projects and campaigns that deserve my full attention and effort.
Russell, do everyone a favour and choose to spend all of your time with your family rather than with anonymous vulnerable and angry people on the internet.
Causality Russell, causality.
I know you have the strength to take this leap because your videos and content online are not your legacy. Your legacy is those three children you chose to create; that is your legacy. I know you will now give to them all of your nurture because you are not inherently evil or ruined. You can rise, you must rise, you must save yourself and your family. Be brave; life is tough, but humans whose hearts are full of optimism are tougher!
Removing my videos, this letter and refraining from publishing the book is more than a generous offer, Russell, it is proof that apathy and cynicism and greed are not the only things in this world, that there is honour still, and free will and hope in these dark hours. You will now decide whether or not this content remains online.
The Great Mimicker
Russell, you are a great mimic, you have ever been a mimic.
Many look at you and think, That guy’s original, really authentic and ‘just himself’. Codswallop.
Why have you been, for so many miserable years, so hypersexual?
Why have you been so anti-authority for so many bitter years?
Why have you believed in certain conspiracy theories for so many years?
Ron. The answer is Ron, your father. The answer is because you ever idolised your father and mimicked him mind, body and soul.
The problem with this, Russell, is that Ron never seems to be happy, does he?
Why did he need to listen to all of those self-help tapes in the car?
Why did he need to do so much boozing and womanising after becoming a father?
Why did he recently suggest to your one-time progressive chum George Monbiot that George ‘could be next’ (next to be taken out by imaginary internationalist global authority billionaire bad guys one assumes) and why did he then, according to Monbiot, share pseudo-conspiratorial videos about the WHO and the World Economic Forum?
***
Russell, everything Ron does you do. Do you not see a pattern here?
Ron has used prostitutes; you have used prostitutes.
Ron likes West Ham; you like West Ham.
Ron binge-drinks alcohol. You binge-drink alcohol—I reference your debaucheries on holiday together in your youth when you were circa sixteen; afterwards, you described the drunken scene and the champagne bottles littered throughout your shared hotel room.
Ron seems to believe in conspiracy theories and seems very paranoid. You seem to believe in conspiracy theories and are paranoid.
Ron seems to fear authority in a paranoid fashion. You seem to fear authority in a paranoid fashion.
Ron seems to be insecure and lacking in confidence (the self-help tapes and are those prescription sunglasses he wears even when it’s grey and overcast?). You seem to be insecure and lacking in confidence—for instance, on the topic of baby vaccines you told your millions of followers on YouTube that you were listening to the opinions of your friends to help you come to a decision on that issue as their opinion was a strong one. They were adamantly opposed, which seemed to influence you, you being moved by emotion more than facts or logic or data or science or Occam’s razor.
Ron seems to hate responsibility (he abandoned you and the family when you were six months old). You seem to hate responsibility—you took no responsibility for Sachsgate; in your interview some time later (referenced in one of the exposé videos), you seemed confused as to why so many were shocked and offended by your actions. You were irresponsible to have done that thing, just as you were irresponsible when you dressed up as Bin Laden the day after 9/11, but you are doubly irresponsible when you are not contrite and apologetic thereafter. You only ever apologise to protect yourself/your career. You believe yourself above the law, untouchable.
Ron seems to be a misogynist. You claimed he was ‘herding’ three Asian prostitutes on the occasion you lost your virginity, with him electing to bed two at the same time as he proclaimed, according to you in your autobiography, ‘Phwoar, you’re juicy.’ You have long, long, long been a misogynist, see my exposé videos for definitive proof.
Russell, as is now obvious to one and all, you are a product of Ron. You are a great mimicker, a great copier; yet, sadly, that which you have copied is unworthy of replication.
You have replicated Ron’s psyche, his fears, his insecurities, his envy, his bingeing, his self-entitlement, his misogyny, his addictions, his delusions, his paranoid and conspiratorial anti-authority world outlook, his ego as well as his strain of irresponsibility and his refusal to grow up and his hatred for accountability and duty and honour.
You have cast off much of what came to dwell inside you as a result of having Ron as a role model—you no longer drink; you no longer (I imagine) use and abuse prostitutes as you once did (you smashed the phone of a Turkish prostitute due to its ringing vexing you and you spat in the face of another prostitute, these are things you have freely admitted in the past).
You have cast off much of your former self, yet still lingers the mistrust of authority, still lingers the conspiracy theorism, blame-shifting and scapegoating, still lingers being in denial and being irresponsible and your refusal to be involved with the rearing/care of your children.
Russell, everything you have learnt from Ron, copied from Ron, mimicked from Ron must be pushed out of your mind, must be disremembered, must be erased from your mind if you desire to become happy, free and reborn. Do not allow yourself to remain Ron for a moment longer as currently you are not an original and authentic human being, you are merely a clone of Ron with a few tweaks and a different haircut.
Prove to Us All That You Are a Man
Russell, if you left YouTube and Twitter and social media in general, would the world end? Are you really the linchpin of life? Or do you merely believe you need to be?
Becoming a father to many others may seem like benevolence. You may feel as though you are helping those you engage with as you tell them what they wish to hear and give them what you once wanted; yet this is not parenting. This is merely people pleasing.
In this moment, Russell, you shouldn’t think about pleasing strangers on the internet or about likes or retweets; rather, in this moment, you should be putting your family first before you lose them. Please understand you are self-sabotaging, you are continuing to be psychologically directed by Ron, who still looms large, you thinking it cowardice to leave social media and a sign of weakness because that’s how Ron thinks.
But you are Russell, not Ron, which means you know the adult and grown-up thing to do in this hour is to remove yourself from the spotlight in every conceivable way. Break your monotropism and obsessiveness; be free from the prison of addiction to likes and retweets and yes-man groupthink fawning comments made by desperately unhappy people who cause you to remain desperately unhappy and unable to achieve your full potential.
You are still trying to impress Ron. You are still overcompensating, you have learnt nothing, despite being intelligent and seeing much and knowing much, because your ego and narcissism are the things that must be restrained as you have power now, the power you so craved in childhood when poor and alone and afraid. Yet despite your long-term impressive work ethic and huge output, when you react with anger to allegations of rape, when you continue engaging in conspiracy theorism and vlogging during the investigations and when you continue to believe that everything will always, magically, be okay, you remain a child because children cannot control their emotions, because children cannot control their ego—but men can, if they care enough about others and themselves concurrently. Be a man, make a positive change. All will benefit as a result.
Russell, who cares what type of comedy Ron likes? What comedy do you like? If you were in a bunker all alone (how you likely feel in this hour) and no one, not Ron, not me, not God, no one could see, would you choose to watch a comedy DVD that featured acts identical to your own? Or would you choose to watch something more light-hearted, maybe something from your childhood that you are still fond of? Would you want to be angry and sad or smiling and happy?
Russell, it is time to grow up.
Devote all of your time to your family, all of it. You need to break the cycle; you need to imagine you are one of your daughters twenty years hence. Would she be more likely to need therapy and would she be more likely to be a drug addict who hates herself due to feeling unloved and abandoned by a psychologically detached father if Daddy had continued ranting online about conspiracies after being accused of rape or if Daddy had smashed his internet modem into pieces with his now grown-up and adult and responsible fists?
Be the man you were born to be, whatever the outcome of the investigations, whatever the consequences one way or another. If you continue to be a detached social media junkie and scapegoating pseudo conspiracy theorist/blame-shifter your children will follow the path of Peaches Geldof and Amy Winehouse, this is for certain. You have no control over such predictable and tragic future actions for so long as you are reading the comments made by complete strangers nations away.
Delete all of your content and social media accounts and then smash your modem with your fist!
By the time the wounds on your knuckles have healed you will no longer miss social media or the overwhelming negative effect it has on your mental health and on your family as you have burdened yourself with altogether too much (businesses, family, comedy shows, politics, vlogging) to the detriment of your family.
You cannot be everyone’s saviour, my friend, but you can save your children by merely being strong and a great father and nullifying the defiance, silencing your ego and trampling on your narcissism and superiority long enough to see how blessed you truly are to have people in your life who love you, who forgive you, who understand you and who need you to walk away from the dark comedy, walk away from social media and walk away from where you are headed—becoming Ron, because they need a hero and that can be you. Or you could “run away to Germany” (repeating Ron’s actions) by devoting yet more time to social media and the fantasy world found therein, which is all escape, which is all merely an excuse not to get your house in order, and all know it.
If you are nothing without the internet, you are nothing full stop. You are something, and something that existed perfectly well before the advent of the internet, so do not place undue value on that detaching creation.
Live in the real world; that is where you will find reality, the one and only reality, the one we all share, where it is normal to make mistakes and apologise for them afterwards, where it is expected that some will be irresponsible and fail to prioritise those they are responsible for, such as their children, yet a reality where we all have a choice as to whether or not we care enough to want our children to be able to lead full and happy and rewarding lives in the future, even if that means making sacrifices such as ending all addictions if these addictions (such as social media/activism) come to imperil your future happiness and mental health and theirs as you spiral into self-sabotage and self-harm as you become racked by panic and fear and shame and regret.
Yet all of this can be avoided. Nothing is fated, you can win, and your children can one day say honestly that they were proud not of their father at all points in his life/career but of what he became, which inspired them and gave them hope and strength throughout their lives and the lives of their children and their children’s children. Think only of your children whilst they are in your care and you will be aiding humanity because they are humanity.
For those online who need a messiah, his name is Jesus or the Dalai Lama or Buddha. Just be Russell, be the father you wanted Ron to be. Be a good man; be a righteous man; reject anger and hate and fear and thoughts of your own victories or defiance. Only think of your children and friends and family, restore their hope in you, raise them up and be there for them and all shall be raised up as a result.
Break the cycle, remember your past. Recall that it was in your head then, just as it is in your head now.
Nothing external affects your family, it is all internal. You have the power to overcome and exert control if that is what you wish. This starts with genuine contrition and humility as all instinctively round on the defiant accused.
Ron didn’t apologise to you, despite you expecting him to, in that boxing ring that day so many years ago.
He wanted to, I saw that he wanted to as you pushed him more and more, as you goaded him; yet he could not say those two simple words that would have softened both of your hearts because he has a past too and great pain and sadness there.
Just know he is sorry and he does love you also, despite not telling you.
The gift of that dog was love; those prostitutes were love (or an attempt at love); that shared alcoholism was love; all love, all filling voids, trying to make you both whole but falling far short of the mark because the booze and the drugs and the sex only caused you misery, regret and depression, as was the case with your comedy, as was the case with your self-therapy achieved via vlogging and leading rather than getting your own house in order.
Does anyone in your family want you to continue your current course of action? Does a single person alive who knows you and cares about you and loves you desire for you to remain on social media for another second? No!
I have come to know you very well this past month, which is why I care what happens to you, so I add my voice to those of your wife and children and of your many friends and relatives who all desire for you to save yourself, and thus your family, by becoming Russell again. You have spent far too long pretending to be something you are not because you have never been Ron, it has only seemed that way. Be you. Let the affectations fall away, let the fear fall away because you are no longer a child, you are a man; prove to us all that you are a man.
Sacrifice
Remove every trace of yourself from the internet, your websites, your social media accounts, everything, and I will happily shelve this exposé and delete all of my content in regards to you. I consider this to be a fair trade.
Will you choosing the correct course of action by bravely making a fundamental positive change in your life and in the lives of your family inspire millions? Will you leaving the internet and public eye immediately give millions hope? Yes, absolutely, as all will witness you overcoming your ego and narcissism; all will witness your splendid rebirth rather than a continuation of your addiction to social media, your unending need for attention and your refusal to grow up.
If you choose the harder yet nobler and civically dutiful course of action (leaving with dignity) all will bear witness to me scrapping my extended exposé video series, deleting my current content fully, never speaking of you again and refraining from publishing the book concerning you, which I have just completed writing.
Your sacrifice will enable my sacrifice.
I desire for all of my content to be published. I worked hard writing that book, researching and writing, creating videos, creating this open letter to you—I have devoted weeks of my life to this combined pursuit.
For me, deleting these videos and this letter and the book in question represents a huge sacrifice, yet it is one I will gladly make if doing so ensures that you are able to make a clean break from the internet and from public life in every way.
You need to start again. You need to respond to change and pressure and conflict and tumult in a new way, a different way, a revolutionary way.
Imagine if you were John Smith for a moment, watching on as you observed Russell Brand delete all his social media accounts and choose to remain silent. Then imagine that not only do you witness that amazing feat but you also witness hours’ worth of exposé videos being deleted and one book (or two) be deleted that were written by a man named Bruce.
Wouldn’t you start believing that those old-fashioned ideals such as honour and dignity and self-sacrifice and duty were not long dead and buried, as most people believe in this throwaway consumerist and greed-based society, but rather due to the actions of a man named Russell, these inspirational things were proven to be very real, just as karma was also proven to be very real also.
If your name was John Smith you would respect Russell if Russell chose to make a clean break and become a regular Joe again by agreeing to my reasonable yet revolutionary terms because whatever Russell may have done in the past, this gesture, this monumental gesture, could only benefit others in the short-term and long-term with the act of choosing ‘self-cancellation’ being deemed immediately to be an honourable action, a grown-up action, a self-sacrificing action and a victory over narcissism, addiction and fate.
Russell, I do not believe it is your fate to continue being so small, I do not believe it is your fate to continue self-sabotaging, I do not believe it is your fate to remain a child. You can evolve and thus cause mass healing and a restoration of hope and sanity as the vulnerable many who hang on your every word are reminded you are not a prophet or a necessary crutch for them but a man, just like me, just like them.
What a gift you can give to millions by separating from them and thus setting them free as presently you infuse little else other than psychological cortisol into the minds and hearts of millions of vulnerable folk. You must change your course, you must climb out of their minds, you must consider yourself an equal to all rather than humanity’s saviour; this is the beginning of wisdom.
Once you stop trying to save, once you stop demanding people look at you and listen to you and copy you and breathe the way you breathe and believe what you believe and be just like you, a carbon copy from diet to politics and music and all else, then and only then will you be you.
Currently you are on the fence about everything, guarding your true beliefs in public about everything, which eats you up inside and rots your heart. It so vexes you that you cannot tell your social media followers your real positions, your real beliefs, as many if not most would flee, which causes you to continually be aware that you are false, just acting, just telling folk what they want to hear, which erodes their sanity and maintains their toxic and corrosive cognitive dissonance whilst slightly increasing your bank balance. Why does a truth seeker need donations or ad revenue?
Continue on the same course of selling merchandise and soliciting funds and “donations” and all will consider you to be an un-empathic narcissistic grifter who chose not to do a great service to the UK and to the world by sacrificing his stardom and following and ability to get even richer or choose the better path, the superior path, that does not involve me publishing the remainder of these videos, the path where I wish you well as we part on good terms in this very hour.
It is so easy to surrender to ego, anger and pride (continuing your self-sabotaging and unhelpful defiance and doubling down) yet so hard to fight against and defeat these things (leaving the internet/public life today). I know which option the old Russell would choose, the Russell who once said, ‘I’m jealous of me then,’ (referring to the time when you were a heroin addict). ‘It doesn’t make a difference to me. The money, the fame, the power, the sex, the women—none of it. I’d rather be a drug addict.’
I know that Russell would have chosen to fight (to leave the internet/public life) because he bravely fought against and defeated his addiction to drugs, because that Russell found some small seed of hope, which grew and blossomed into purpose and direction and motivation. That Russell (of 2012) looking back at his past enslaved to drugs spoke of temptation and a desire to take the easy path by reaching for the syringe once again; yet he resisted, you resisted, which you deserve to be proud of. You showed character and great strength and proved you have the ability to learn, overcome and adapt and evolve.
The heroin of 2023 for you is social media and your following and narrow monotropism and obsessiveness and defiance as you search for enemies and causes that prevent you from being happy, that prevent self-actualisation, that tether you to the syringe and to nihilism and depression and despondency and lowliness and surrender and fence-sitting and doom spreading.
I do not want to publish any more exposé videos about you, nor do I want to publish the book I have written about you. I am not a journalist, I derive no pleasure from these endeavours, yet duty compels me to act, just as duty should compel you to act in this hour, Russell. We all need a win in this hour, and that win is you defying expectation and shocking the world by forcing me to scrap my videos and book and the remainder of this exposé and this letter.
What a win, what a victory that would be for everyone, for everyone.
***
Originally I was just going to launch all 13 videos and the book without writing you this open letter, but then I saw a photo of you in New York City from years back, which has caused me to change my approach.
I offer you these fair terms and the ability to avoid the publication of nine additional videos as well as the 100,000-word-plus biographical and psychoanalytical exposé because, despite all the bad, there is good in you also. There is humanity and vulnerability and fragility in you.
How do I know? Why is it that I am even suggesting this compromise?
Because I am very observant, because I care, because optimism and caring are superior and preferable to pessimism and not caring, which allowed me to observe just what it was that was hanging around your neck in New York that day. Of course, all those present had no idea what that necklace meant, what it represented, nor what it said about you as a person and as a man, but it spoke volumes to me. I saw what you chose to wear on that day, that day of huge pressure and expectation, out of your element, in crowds of people, in that noisy and foreign environment, so far from Grays, so far from England and so far from West Ham.…
I had observed you wearing dozens of distinct and unique necklaces over the years in the many photos and videos I’d looked at in the past weeks, yet never had I witnessed you wearing the necklace in question (see the photo below) at any other times in public, other than when attending football matches.
Your choice of necklaces for TV and stand-up performances and for award shows was always large and loud and brash and edgy and gothic or similarly unusual and attention-grabbing—so, to my eyes, when I saw you wearing that necklace in NYC, the West Ham Hammers small and discreet and very personal necklace, I knew it acted as a talisman, a good luck charm for you. I knew you wanted to be genuine and authentic and you, the real you then, rather than the fake persona so many are familiar with.
I know you attended West Ham matches as a child with your father, I know doing so made you feel like you had a big family, like you had siblings, like you belonged and were loved and accepted and protected.
So this is why I am happy to delete and scrap that book and the additional nine instalments of the video exposé series; because of your insecurities, your fears, your vulnerabilities, your humanity and your desperate search for love and attention and purpose and acceptance and validation.
You now wear the necklace of ConjectureMania; you now wear the necklace of conspiracy theorism and the necklace of a pseudo cult leader. Russell, I implore you, remove these necklaces, they are no good for you, they are a bad fit.
Put them away in a drawer somewhere and refind that old, quaint, meaningful, humble and honest West Ham necklace.
Place it around your neck and, immediately after, delete your social media profiles and become free, become a free man.
Choose to fight back by smashing your modem—fame and the internet are destroying your soul and sanity.
Fight back, Russell, bravely delete your profiles and websites and all else. Be free, be you again, become a real awakened wonder, or surrender, reach out once again for escapism and desperation and the syringe as you submit to pride and fear and ego.
Russell, I do not believe you need to be the villain for life.
Will you now be humble, strong, dutiful, civically minded and wise or will you keep injecting yourself and thus your vulnerable and impressionable followers who idolise you?
Whatever your choice, I am ready to either congratulate you or to finish what I’ve started.
Yours Faithfully,
Bruce
(All articles, content and sample chapters on brucemasters.org can be reproduced in full, without limitation, either online or in print. It is necessary to cite the original source and to credit the author of the content—Dr Bruce Masters: Brucemasters.org.)